Grazing herbivores reduce herbaceous biomass and fire activity across African savannas
Allison Tyler Karp,Sally E. Koerner,Gareth P. Hempson,Joel O. Abraham,T. Michael Anderson,William J. Bond,Deron E. Burkepile,Elizabeth N. Fillion,Jacob R. Goheen,Jennifer A. Guyton,Tyler R. Kartzinel,Duncan M. Kimuyu,Neha Mohanbabu,Todd M. Palmer,Lauren M. Porensky,Robert M. Pringle,Mark E. Ritchie,Melinda D. Smith,Dave I. Thompson,Truman P. Young,A. Carla Staver
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14450
IF: 11.274
2024-06-12
Ecology Letters
Abstract:Grazing herbivores substantially influence terrestrial ecosystem processes, especially in African savannas where wild herbivores can occur at high densities and grass‐fuelled fires are frequent, but the size of these effects and what regulates them remain uncertain. To examine grazing effects on fuels and fire regimes across African savannas, we combined data from herbivore exclosure experiments with remotely sensed data on fire activity and herbivore density. Our results indicate that (1) the magnitude of grazing effects on herbaceous biomass and fire activity is substantial across African savannas, (2) although there was some variation in herbivore effect on grass biomass across environmental gradients, this was minor compared with the effect of herbivore metabolic densities, and (3) grazing reduces fire activity, (4) most likely by consuming fuel loads. Fire and herbivory interact to alter ecosystems and carbon cycling. In savannas, herbivores can reduce fire activity by removing grass biomass, but the size of these effects and what regulates them remain uncertain. To examine grazing effects on fuels and fire regimes across African savannas, we combined data from herbivore exclosure experiments with remotely sensed data on fire activity and herbivore density. We show that, broadly across African savannas, grazing herbivores substantially reduce both herbaceous biomass and fire activity. The size of these effects was strongly associated with grazing herbivore densities, and surprisingly, was mostly consistent across different environments. A one‐zebra increase in herbivore biomass density (~100 kg/km2 of metabolic biomass) resulted in a ~53 kg/ha reduction in standing herbaceous biomass and a ~0.43 percentage point reduction in burned area. Our results indicate that fire models can be improved by incorporating grazing effects on grass biomass.
ecology