Pilot, open, randomized, multicenter trial for the comparison of hypothermic versus normothermic ex-situ liver preservation in DCD liver transplantation with extended ischemia time (DCDNet trial)

J. Bronzoni,D. Pezzati,P. Carrai,S. Petruccelli,C. Martinelli,P.G. Vacca,E. Balzano,G. Catalano,S. Palladino,G. Tincani,D. Ghinolfi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.060
IF: 5.165
2024-02-01
Digestive and Liver Disease
Abstract:Introduction In Italy, 20 minutes of continuous, flat-line electrocardiogram are required for death declaration, which significantly increases the risks of complications after DCD liver transplantation. Despite prolonged warm ischemia time, Italian centers reported good outcomes in DCD liver transplantation by combining normothermic regional (NRP) and end-ischemic machine perfusion. However, there are no studies in this particular setting comparing the two main ex-situ preservation techniques: dual-hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (D-HOPE) versus normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). Methods DCDs donors offered to our center were retrieved after a period of NRP. Graft eligibility to transplantation was assessed on NRP parameters. Grafts were then transported to our center and randomized to NMP or D-HOPE and transplanted after a variable period. Results Between January 2021 to November 2023, 29 liver grafts were procured and transplanted, being 13 assigned to DHOPE and 16 to NMP group. Median donor age was 62 and 57 years (p=0.12) in D-HOPE and NMP group, respectively, being 11 (38%) grafts older than 80 years. 90-day graft survival was 84% versus 100% (p=0.12) in D-HOPE and NMP group respectively. No differences in terms of post-reperfusion syndrome rate (31% versus 31%, p=0.97), early allograft dysfunction rate (31% versus 19%, p=0.56), ICU stay (6,1 versus 4,7 days, p=0.57), hospital stay (15,9 versus 15,5 days, p=0.92) were noted in the D-HOPE and NMP group, respectively. There were 5 cases of biliary complications in NMP group (2 ischemic cholangiopathy, 1 anastomotic stricture and 2 leakages) vs 2 (2 anastomotic strictures) in D-HOPE group (p=0.3). Conclusions The sequential use of NRP and end-ischemic machine perfusion is a safe method to perform DCD liver transplants with extended warm ischemia time without donor age limits. No major differences between D-HOPE and NMP have been showed. Further data are needed to draw definitive conclusions.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?