Abstract:Background: It is necessary to ensure sufficient healthcare. The use of current, precise and realistic methods to model spatial accessibility to healthcare and thus improved decision-making is helping this process. Generally, these methods-which include the family of floating catchment area (FCA) methods-incorporate a number of criteria that address topics like access, efficiency, budget, equity and the overall system utilization. How can we measure spatial accessibility? This paper investigates a sophisticated approach for quantifying the spatial accessibility of general practitioners. (GPs). Our objective is the investigation and application of a spatial accessibility index by an improved Huff three-step floating catchment area (MH3SFCA) method. Methods: We modify and implement the huff model three-step floating catchment area (MH3SFCA) method and exemplary calculation of the spatial accessibility indices for the test study area. The method is extended to incorporate a more realistic way to model the distance decay effect. To that end, instead of a binary approach, a continuous approach is employed. Therefore, each distance between a healthcare site and the population is incorporated individually. The study area includes Swabia and the city of Augsburg, Germany. The data for analysis is obtained from following data sources: (1) Acxiom Deutschland GmbH (2020) provided a test dataset for the locations of general practitioners (GPs); (2) OpenStreetMap (OSM) data is utilized for road networks; and (3) the Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (German official census 2011) provided a population distribution dataset stemming from the 2011 Census. Results: The spatial accessibility indices are distributed in an inhomogeneous as well as polycentric pattern for the general practitioners (GPs). Differences in spatial accessibility are found mainly between urban and rural areas. The transitions from lower to higher values of accessibility or vice versa in general are smooth rather than abrupt. The results indicate that the MH3SFCA method is suited for comparing the spatial accessibility of GPs in different regions. The results of the MH3SFCA method can be used to indicate over- and undersupplied areas. However, the absolute values of the indices do not inherently define accessibility to be too low or too high. Instead, the indices compare the spatial relationships between each supply and demand location. As a result, the higher the value of the accessibility indices, the higher the opportunities for the respective population locations. The result for the study area are exemplary as the test input data has a high uncertainty. Depending on the objective, it might be necessary to further analyze the results of the method. Conclusions: The application of the MH3SFCA method on small-scale data can provide an overview of accessibility for the whole study area. As many factors have to be taken into account, the outcomes are too complex for a direct and clear interpretation of why indices are low or high. The MH3SFCA method can be used to detect differences in accessibility on a small scale. In order to effectively detect over- or undersupply, further analysis must be conducted and/or different (legal) constraints must be applied. The methodology requires input data of high quality.

Towards more realistic measures of accessibility to emergency departments in Sweden

Estimating Accessibility Problems in the Swedish Housing Stock Using Citizen Science: The Housing Experiment 2021

New accessibility measures based on unconventional big data sources

Inequity in access to digital public primary healthcare in Sweden: a cross-sectional study of the effects of urbanicity and socioeconomic status on utilization

Evaluation of Healthcare Inequity for Older Adults: A Spatio-Temporal Perspective

Correlates of perceived accessibility across transport modes and trip purposes: Insights from a Swedish survey

Public Beliefs About Accessibility and Quality of Emergency Departments in Germany

Limited need for hospital resources among patients brought to hospital by the emergency medical services

Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden

The skåne emergency medicine (SEM) cohort

Access to Emergency Services: A New York City Case Study

Access to Hospitals: Potential Vs. Observed

Epidemiology of patients assessed for trauma by Swedish ambulance services: a retrospective registry study

Homecare workers - an untapped resource in preventing emergency department visits among older individuals? A qualitative interview study from Sweden

Evaluating spatial accessibility to healthcare services from the lens of emergency hospital visits based on floating car data

Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues

Diagnosing an overcrowded emergency department from its Electronic Health Records

Patient-centred Method to Evaluate the Spatial Accessibility of Primary Health Care in a Case Study in Shanghai

Quantifying spatial accessibility of general practitioners by applying a modified huff three-step floating catchment area (MH3SFCA) method

The non-conveyance of trauma patients in Swedish emergency medical services: a retrospective observational study of the trauma population not transported to an emergency department

Enhancing healthcare accessibility measurements using GIS: A case study in Seoul, Korea