Abstract:Background: Patients undergoing lower extremity bypasses (LEB) are at a high risk of developing post-discharge complications requiring readmission. Health systems have developed several strategies to mitigate this risk. One such measure is developing comprehensive Transitional Care Program (TCP), which includes phone calls to patients after being discharged from the hospital. Our study aimed to assess short-term readmission, mortality, and amputation rates of patients who participated in TCP by completing at least one post-discharge follow-up phone call after undergoing LEB for revascularization of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods: A retrospective review was completed for patients who underwent LEB surgery between January 2010 and January 2020 to treat PAD at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. Immediate discharge follow-up was done via telephone calls using a standardized script. Patients were then divided into two groups, those who did not have a successful follow-up call (Group I) and those who had at least one successful follow-up call within seven days after discharge (Group II). Univariate analysis was used to compare preoperative demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes. The probability of readmission and risk factors contributing to it were computed using multiple stepwise forward regression analyses. Epidemiological analysis was done to evaluate the risk of readmission in the group receiving post-discharge follow-up calls. Results: A total of 457 patients underwent LEB from 2010 to 2020 and qualified for inclusion in the study. Among these patients, 126 (27.6%) did not have a successful post-discharge follow-up call (Group I), whereas, 331 (72.4%) patients did complete a successful call (Group II). The mean age of patients was 66.7 years. There were no significant differences in preoperative baseline patient characteristics or intraoperative factors. Patients who completed a successful call had lower readmission rates within thirty days of the operation (8.8 vs. 17.5%, P = 0.008), and this was sustained in multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio AOR: 0.18, [confidence interval CI: 0.05-0.66], P = 0.009). However, no differences were observed for thirty-day mortality (Group-I: 3.2% versus Group-II: 1.2%, P = 0.152) or amputation (Group-I: 9.6% versus Group II 5.9%, P = 0.162). Among those who had a successful call, patients with a history of smoking (AOR: 4.05 [CI: 1.21, 17.12] P = 0.025), diabetes mellitus (AOR: 3.42 [CI: 1.35, 8.7] P = 0.01) and myocardial infarction (AOR: 7.15 [CI: 1.76, 20.1] P = 0.006) had a much higher chances of readmission. Risk analysis using epidemiological methods showed that by receiving a call, the risk of readmission could be dropped to half (RR: 0.50 [CI: 0.30, 0.84]), with an attributable risk reduction of -8.7% (CI: -15.9%, -1.4%). Conclusions: This single-institution retrospective study demonstrates the importance of immediate discharge follow-up phone calls in patients who undergo open lower extremity revascularization to reduce thirty-day readmissions. Our analysis showed patients who received immediate follow-up phone calls were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital. The development of reliable and efficient systems to enhance immediate discharge follow-up in vascular surgery patients is pivotal to improving quality of care, preventing readmissions, and reducing healthcare costs.

Practice Patterns of Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease in the Office-Based Laboratory Setting versus Outpatient Hospital

20 Characteristics of Medicare patients receiving peripheral vascular interventions for peripheral artery disease differ by outpatient site of service

The impact of health disparities on peripheral vascular access outcomes in hospitalized patients: an observational study

Outpatient surgery benchmarks and practice variation patterns: Case controlled study

Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Deep Venous Arterialization in Multiple Practice Settings

Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome

Evaluating Receipt of Optimal Medical Therapy Among Structurally Disadvantaged Groups Undergoing Amputation

Abstract No. 575 Site of Service Practice Patterns for Interventional Radiologists and Advanced Practice Providers in Academic and Private Practices

How multidisciplinary clinics may mitigate socioeconomic barriers to care for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Implementation of Transitional Care Planning is Associated with Reduced Readmission Rates in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery for Peripheral Arterial Disease

Impact of a Peripheral Vascular Access Service on Device Use

Diversity in clinical trial inclusion for peripheral artery disease lower extremity endovascular interventions: a systematic review protocol

The association between provider characteristics and post-catheterization interventions

Practice Patterns and Sociodemographic Disparities in the Clinical Care of Anatomical Narrow Angles in the United States

Association of health status and hospitalization risk for peripheral artery disease in the PORTRAIT registry

Presentation and patterns of reinterventions after revascularization in patients with premature Peripheral Arterial Disease

Patient Reported Barriers for Participation in Supervised Exercise Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease

A Practical Guide to Understanding and Treating Peripheral Artery Disease

Impact of early intervention on health status outcomes in peripheral artery disease patients with chronic total occlusion lesions using the PORTRAIT registry

Abstract TMP22: Removing Disparities Related to Thrombectomy Transfers Within an Integrated Healthcare System Across Fourteen Primary Stroke Centers

Popliteal Access for Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease in the Office-Based Catheter Laboratory