Analysis and development of an online knowledge management support system for a Community of Practice: Comparing Joomla, Wordpress and Drupal with regard to development of Community of Practice Website

Moeketsi Mafereka,S. Winberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3077584.3077604
2017-04-01
Abstract:The purpose of this study is to compare Content Management Systems (CMSes), namely Drupal, Joomla and WordPress, with regard to the development and maintenance of online services to support a Knowledge Management System (KMS) used by a Community of Practice (COP). The main objective of this KMS is to enhance business processes and save costs for a multi-site organization through streamlining the organizational practices of knowledge creation, storage, sharing and application. Our methodology uses a multiple perspective approach, in which the requirements gathering and definition process is done through a combination of interviews with company employees and a literature review of best practices. From the requirements gathering we develop a generic list of COP website requirements which was then used to develop a questionnaire that was completed by experienced website developers for comparing different CMSes for use of hosting the COP website. Our findings show that WordPress provided adequate functionality and the greatest ease of use for aspects measured in this study. However, Joomla and Drupal were considered to provide a greater collection of features suited to creation of the COP website, but these tools were indicated as needing stronger programming skills. Joomla was viewed by the respondents as having best flexibility of content position and module integration with other web tools and languages such as JavaScripts. It was observed that Drupal was considered best in terms of customization and ease of scalability for the application considered.
Computer Science,Business,Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?