Abstract:Increasing incidents of cyber attacks and evolution of quantum computing poses challenges to secure existing information and communication technologies infrastructure. In recent years, quantum key distribution (QKD) is being extensively researched, and is widely accepted as a promising technology to realize secure networks. Optical fiber networks carry a huge amount of information, and are widely deployed around the world in the backbone terrestrial, submarine, metro, and access networks. Thus, instead of using separate dark fibers for quantum communication, integration of QKD with the existing classical optical networks has been proposed as a cost-efficient solution, however, this integration introduces new research challenges. In this paper, we do a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art QKD secured optical networks, which is going to shape communication networks in the coming decades. We elucidate the methods and protocols used in QKD secured optical networks, and describe the process of key establishment. Various methods proposed in the literature to address the networking challenges in QKD secured optical networks, specifically, routing, wavelength and time-slot allocation (RWTA), resiliency, trusted repeater node (TRN) placement, QKD for multicast service, and quantum key recycling are described and compared in detail. This survey begins with the introduction to QKD and its advantages over conventional encryption methods. Thereafter, an overview of QKD is given including quantum bits, basic QKD system, QKD schemes and protocol families along with the detailed description of QKD process based on the Bennett and Brassard-84 (BB84) protocol as it is the most widely used QKD protocol in the literature. QKD system are also prone to some specific types of attacks, hence, we describe the types of quantum hacking attacks on the QKD system along with the methods used to prevent them. Subsequently, the process of point-to-point mechanism of QKD over an optical fiber link is described in detail using the BB84 protocol. Different architectures of QKD secured optical networks are described next. Finally, major findings from this comprehensive survey are summarized with highlighting open issues and challenges in QKD secured optical networks.

FSO-QKD protocols under free-space losses and device imperfections: a comparative study

FSO-QKD protocols under free space losses and device imperfections: a comparative study

Prepare-and-measure based QKD protocol under free-space losses

Analysis of atmospheric effects on satellite based quantum communication: A comparative study

Experimental free-space quantum key distribution over a turbulent high-loss channel

Optimal design and performance evaluation of free-space Quantum Key Distribution systems

Finite key performance of satellite quantum key distribution under practical constraints

Daytime and Nighttime QKD over an atmospheric free space channel with passive polarisation bases compensation

Analysing QBER and secure key rate under various losses for satellite based free space QKD

Free space optical communication using OQPSK in the presence of strong atmospheric turbulence and losses

Experimental implementation of distributed phase reference quantum key distribution protocols

Finite resource performance of small satellite-based quantum key distribution missions

Free Space Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phases

Quantum Key Distribution Secured Optical Networks: A Survey

Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with imperfect light sources

Experimental measurement-device-independent type quantum key distribution with flawed and correlated sources

AirQKD: The Role of Free-Space Optics Quantum Key Distribution Enabling Pragmatic Secure and Scalable Communications

Simple and loss-tolerant free-space QKD using a squeezed laser

Free-space Quantum Key Distribution over Daylight and Night Time

Quantum Key Distribution: Security, Feasibility and Robustness