The value of the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as complementary diagnostic tools in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter retrospective study
Zihan Jin,Gaojun Cai,Ping Zhang,Xiaohong Li,Shuang Yao,Lin Zhuang,Min Ren,Qiang Wang,Xiaolong Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23569
IF: 3.124
2020-09-19
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have drawn attention in recent years as novel non‐specific inflammatory markers; however, only a few studies have been conducted to investigate their value in RA.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To investigate the value of the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as complementary diagnostic tools in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Method</h3><p>This study included 1009 patients with RA, 170 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 245 healthy individuals from four medical centers. The patients' general data, including complete blood count, C‐reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and rheumatoid factor (RF), were retrospectively analyzed, and the NLR and PLR were calculated. Potential effective indicators were screened by logistic regression analysis, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate their diagnostic value for RA.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>(a) The NLR and PLR were significantly higher in the RA group than in the non‐RA group and the control group (<i>P</i> < .05). (b) Spearman's Rho showed that the NLR was positively correlated with the PLR (<i>r</i> = .584, <i>P</i> < .05), RF (<i>r</i> = .167, <i>P</i> < .01), and CRP (<i>r</i> = .280, <i>P</i> < .01) but was not significantly correlated with ESR (<i>r</i> = .100, <i>P</i> > .05). The PLR was positively correlated with RF (<i>r</i> = .139, <i>P</i> < .01), CRP (<i>r</i> = .297, <i>P</i> < .01), and ESR (<i>r</i> = .262, <i>P</i> < .05). (c) Logistic analysis showed that RF, CRP, ESR, and the NLR had diagnostic value for RA. (d) For the NLR, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was 0.831; at the cutoff value of 2.13, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Youden index were 76.7%, 75.9%, 76.4%, and 0.5424, respectively. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>The NLR was less effective than CRP and RF but was superior to ESR in the diagnosis of RA. The NLR can thus be used as a complementary diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis of RA.</p></section>
medical laboratory technology