Correction to "Gentrification's association with police violence and the moderating effects of race" by Harmon-Darrow et al. (2023).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000517
2024-05-03
Psychology of Violence
Abstract:Reports an error in "Gentrification's association with police violence and the moderating effects of race" by Caroline Harmon-Darrow, Hyun-Jin Jun and Charlotte Lyn Bright ( Psychology of Violence , 2023[May], Vol 13[3], 183-193). In the article, corrections to some findings were needed. For the Gentrification Revitalization × Race and the Gentrification Disruption × Race interactions (reported in Tables 3 and 4, respectively), one statistically significant figure was not interpreted (the association between gentrification revitalization and risk of police psychological violence), and three statistically significant figures were interpreted in reverse (the associations between gentrification revitalization and police physical violence, between gentrification disruption and police psychological violence, and between gentrification disruption and physical violence) in the text. In the case of the association between gentrification revitalization and risk of police psychological violence, the relationships were stronger for respondents of color. For the associations between gentrification revitalization and police physical violence, between gentrification disruption and police psychological violence, and between gentrification disruption and physical violence, the relationships were weaker, not stronger, for respondents of color as originally stated. Corrections were made in the , in the Results section in the last paragraph under "Logistic Regression Models," and in the fourth paragraph of the Discussion section. The other findings and conclusions of the article remain unchanged. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2023-42796-001.) Objective: To identify the relationship between perceived gentrification and negative police experiences (psychological and physical violence, and neglect), as well as the potential moderating effects of race on these associations. Method: Data were drawn from the second Survey of Police–Public Encounters (SPPE II), a cross-sectional, general population survey study ( N = 1,000) that assessed respondents' self-reports of police violence exposure and neighborhood perceptions. Moderated logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations among race, neighborhood perceptions of gentrification-related revitalization and disruption, and psychological and physical violence and neglect by police. Results: Perceived gentrification revitalization was significantly associated with decreased risk of neglect by police. Perceived gentrification disruption had a significant association with greater risk of self-reported physical violence by police as well as neglect. The association between gentrification revitalization and risk of police psychological violence was stronger for respondents of color, while the associations between gentrification revitalization and police physical violence as well as between gentrification disruption and police psychological and physical violence were weaker for participants of color. Conclusions: Results support the importance of disentangling the dynamics of gentrification before examining their association with policing, since different aspects of perceived gentrification related differently to three types of police violence. Future research could investigate these perceptions connected with neighborhood data over time to examine whether perceptions and economic indicators are linked, and whether associations with policing change based on gentrification stage. Policymakers and practitioners should confront and eliminate biased policing, respond to the trauma and fear associated with harmful policing and gentrification, and heal personal and community impacts of police violence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
psychology, clinical,family studies,criminology & penology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?