Integrating national accounting and macroeconomic approaches to estimate the underground, informal, and illegal economy in European countries

Roberto Dell’Anno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-024-09835-y

2024-05-08

International Tax and Public Finance

Abstract:This article proposes a hybrid national accounts (NA)-macroeconometric approach to fill the gap between the demand for reliable and internationally comparable estimates and the sparse availability of official statistics based on the NA approach. The proposed method combines data from Eurostat's Tabular approach for the exhaustiveness of NA with estimates based on theoretical hypotheses on the drivers of non-observed production. We estimate underground, informal, and illegal economies for 22 European countries over the period 2000–2020.

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is how to reliably estimate the size of the underground economy, informal economy, and illegal economy in European countries. Specifically, the authors propose a hybrid approach that combines the National Accounts (NA) method and macroeconomic estimation methods to fill the gaps in existing official statistics and provide internationally comparable estimates.

### Main Issues
1. **Data Scarcity**: The availability of existing official statistics based on the National Accounts method is limited, making it difficult to obtain reliable and internationally comparable estimates.
2. **Methodological Controversy**: The current methods used to estimate the Non-Observed Economy (NOE) are controversial. While macroeconomic estimation methods are widely used in economic literature, their arbitrary assumptions lead to questions about their reliability. On the other hand, the National Accounts method is considered a more reliable choice, but its application is limited due to inconsistent classification, data opacity, and lack of regular publication.
3. **Method Complementarity**: Macroeconomic estimation methods and the National Accounts method are often seen as competitors rather than complementary tools, and this adversarial attitude hinders the advancement of knowledge.

### Solutions
1. **Hybrid Method**: The authors propose a hybrid method that combines the National Accounts method and macroeconomic estimation methods, aiming to leverage the strengths of both to improve the reliability and international comparability of estimates.
2. **Data Transparency**: By utilizing the more transparent National Accounts data provided by European countries since 2022 (such as GNI inventories), the authors can obtain more detailed information on the GDP/GNI compilation process.
3. **Consistency and Complementarity**: Starting from National Accounts estimates and definitions, the authors obtain estimates consistent with international statistical standards and economic analysis purposes, demonstrating that the two methods can serve as complementary tools to enhance understanding in this field.
4. **Bias Analysis**: By comparing National Accounts estimates from different countries, the authors find that some countries' National Accounts estimates may be underestimated and explore possible reasons for this.

### Conclusion
This study, by proposing a new hybrid method, not only improves the accuracy of estimates for the underground economy, informal economy, and illegal economy but also promotes the complementarity between macroeconomic estimation methods and the National Accounts method, providing new ideas and tools for future research.