Kamel Mansouri,Agnes L. Karmaus,Jeremy Fitzpatrick,Grace Patlewicz,Prachi Pradeep,Domenico Alberga,Nathalie Alepee,Timothy E.H. Allen,Dave Allen,Vinicius M. Alves,Carolina H. Andrade,Tyler R. Auernhammer,Davide Ballabio,Shannon Bell,Emilio Benfenati,Sudin Bhattacharya,Joyce V. Bastos,Stephen Boyd,J.B. Brown,Stephen J. Capuzzi,Yaroslav Chushak,Heather Ciallella,Alex M. Clark,Viviana Consonni,Pankaj R. Daga,Sean Ekins,Sherif Farag,Maxim Fedorov,Denis Fourches,Domenico Gadaleta,Feng Gao,Jeffery M. Gearhart,Garett Goh,Jonathan M. Goodman,Francesca Grisoni,Christopher M. Grulke,Thomas Hartung,Matthew Hirn,Pavel Karpov,Alexandru Korotcov,Giovanna J. Lavado,Michael Lawless,Xinhao Li,Thomas Luechtefeld,Filippo Lunghini,Giuseppe F. Mangiatordi,Gilles Marcou,Dan Marsh,Todd Martin,Andrea Mauri,Eugene N. Muratov,Glenn J. Myatt,Dac-Trung Nguyen,Orazio Nicolotti,Reine Note,Paritosh Pande,Amanda K. Parks,Tyler Peryea,Ahsan H. Polash,Robert Rallo,Alessandra Roncaglioni,Craig Rowlands,Patricia Ruiz,Daniel P. Russo,Ahmed Sayed,Risa Sayre,Timothy Sheils,Charles Siegel,Arthur C. Silva,Anton Simeonov,Sergey Sosnin,Noel Southall,Judy Strickland,Yun Tang,Brian Teppen,Igor V. Tetko,Dennis Thomas,Valery Tkachenko,Roberto Todeschini,Cosimo Toma,Ignacio Tripodi,Daniela Trisciuzzi,Alexander Tropsha,Alexandre Varnek,Kristijan Vukovic,Zhongyu Wang,Liguo Wang,Katrina M. Waters,Andrew J. Wedlake,Sanjeeva J. Wijeyesakere,Dan Wilson,Zijun Xiao,Hongbin Yang,Gergely Zahoranszky-Kohalmi,Alexey V. Zakharov,Fagen F. Zhang,Zhen Zhang,Tongan Zhao,Hao Zhu,Kimberley M. Zorn,Warren Casey,Nicole C. Kleinstreuer

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Humans are exposed to tens of thousands of chemical substances that need to be assessed for their potential toxicity. Acute systemic toxicity testing serves as the basis for regulatory hazard classification, labeling, and risk management. However, it is cost- and time-prohibitive to evaluate all new and existing chemicals using traditional rodent acute toxicity tests. In silico models built using existing data facilitate rapid acute toxicity predictions without using animals.OBJECTIVES: The U.S. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) Acute Toxicity Workgroup organized an international collaboration to develop in silico models for predicting acute oral toxicity based on five different end points: Lethal Dose 50 (<math><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mtext>LD</mtext></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>50</mn></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></math> value, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hazard (four) categories, Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labeling hazard (five) categories, very toxic chemicals [<math><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mtext>LD</mtext></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>50</mn></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></math> (<math><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mtext>LD</mtext></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>50</mn></mrow></mrow></msub><mo>≤</mo><mn>50</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mg</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>kg</mi></mrow></math>)], and nontoxic chemicals (<math><mrow><mi>L</mi><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>50</mn></mrow></mrow></msub><mo>></mo><mn>2,000</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mg</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>kg</mi></mrow></math>).METHODS: An acute oral toxicity data inventory for 11,992 chemicals was compiled, split into training and evaluation sets, and made available to 35 participating international research groups that submitted a total of 139 predictive models. Predictions that fell within the applicability domains of the submitted models were evaluated using external validation sets. These were then combined into consensus models to leverage strengths of individual approaches.RESULTS: The resulting consensus predictions, which leverage the collective strengths of each individual model, form the Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite (CATMoS). CATMoS demonstrated high performance in terms of accuracy and robustness when compared with in vivo results.DISCUSSION: CATMoS is being evaluated by regulatory agencies for its utility and applicability as a potential replacement for in vivo rat acute oral toxicity studies. CATMoS predictions for more than 800,000 chemicals have been made available via the National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment tools and data sets (ice.ntp.niehs.nih.gov). The models are also implemented in a free, standalone, open-source tool, OPERA, which allows predictions of new and untested chemicals to be made. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8495.

Development and application of consensus in silico models for advancing high-throughput toxicological predictions

CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity

An Adaptive and Interpretable Modeling Architecture Assisted Rapid and Reliable Consensus Prediction for Hazardous Properties of Chemicals

Consensus QSAR models estimating acute toxicity to aquatic organisms from different trophic levels: algae, Daphnia and fish

Ecotoxicological QSAR Modelling of the Acute Toxicity of Fused and Non-Fused Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (fnfpahs) Against Two Aquatic Organisms: Consensus Modelling and Comparison with ECOSAR

The database makes the poison: How the selection of datasets in QSAR models impacts toxicant prediction of higher tier endpoints

Predicting Chemical Immunotoxicity through Data-Driven QSAR Modeling of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonism and Related Toxicity Mechanisms

In Silico Prediction of Oral Acute Rodent Toxicity Using Consensus Machine Learning

From molecular descriptors to the developmental toxicity prediction of pesticides/veterinary drugs/bio-pesticides against zebrafish embryo: Dual computational toxicological approaches for prioritization

Understanding and overcoming the technical challenges in using in silico predictions in regulatory decisions of complex toxicological endpoints - A pesticide perspective for regulatory toxicologists with a focus on machine learning models

Novel Consensus Architecture To Improve Performance of Large-Scale Multitask Deep Learning QSAR Models

Discriminant Models on Mitochondrial Toxicity Improved by Consensus Modeling and Resolving Imbalance in Training.

QSAR Models Using a Large Diverse Set of Estrogens

Bio-QSARs 2.0: Unlocking a new level of predictive power for machine learning-based ecotoxicity predictions by exploiting chemical and biological information

Building species trait-specific nano-QSARs: Model stacking, navigating model uncertainties and limitations, and the effect of dataset size

CATMoS: Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite

Machine learning models for rat multigeneration reproductive toxicity prediction

Predictive Models for Human Organ Toxicity Based on in Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure

Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts.

An automated computational data pipeline to rapidly acquire, score, and rank toxicological data for ecological hazard assessment

Toxicity prediction using target, interactome, and pathway profiles as descriptors