Why am I here? The influence of group and relational attributes on member-initiated team selection

Zoe I. Barsness,Ann E. Tenbrunsel,Judd H. Michael,Lucinda Lawson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-0856(02)04007-0
2024-01-13
Research on Managing Groups and Teams
Abstract:Many organizations have moved to adopt high performance work designs in an effort to enhance organizational flexibility while increasing efficiency, output, and product quality. As a result, the use of voluntary organization-sponsored teams such as task forces, project teams and quality improvement teams has become increasingly common. Relatively little research, however, has examined the process through which the membership of such groups is assembled. Even less is understood about the factors that encourage greater employee participation in these types of teams. Relying on social exchange theory, social identity theory, and the diversity literature, we explore the group creation process from the individual as perspective. Specifically, we explore the factors that motivate an individual to join a particular team. Propositions relating the influence of group and relational attributes to member-initiated team selection are then developed that further expand our understanding of the effects of group attractiveness, social categorization, relational demography and network processes on group creation. In closing, we discuss the implications of our model for managers and suggest some directions for future research.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is understanding the factors individuals consider when choosing to join a specific team, particularly how these factors influence the process of members proactively choosing to join a team. Specifically, the author explores how team attributes (such as team status, past success, information diversity) and relational attributes (such as social category diversity, network processes, relational value diversity, relational information diversity) jointly influence whether individuals are willing to join a particular team. ### Main Research Questions: 1. **The impact of team attributes on members' proactive team selection**: - Team status: Are high-status teams more attractive? - Past success: Does a team's past success record influence an individual's decision to join? - Information diversity: Does the diversity of skills, knowledge, and perspectives among team members enhance the team's attractiveness? 2. **The impact of relational attributes on members' proactive team selection**: - Social category diversity: How does the similarity or difference in social categories such as age, gender, and race between an individual and other team members affect the decision to join? - Network processes: How do social network relationships between an individual and team members influence the decision to join? - Relational value diversity: How does the similarity or difference in values between an individual and team members affect the decision to join? - Relational information diversity: How does the similarity or difference in information acquisition and sharing between an individual and team members affect the decision to join? ### Research Background: Many organizations adopt high-performance work designs to improve flexibility, efficiency, output, and product quality. Therefore, voluntarily organized teams (such as task groups, project teams, and quality improvement teams) are becoming increasingly common. However, research on the composition process of these teams is relatively scarce, especially regarding which factors can encourage employees to participate more in these teams. ### Research Purpose: By exploring the team attributes and relational attributes that individuals consider when choosing to join a specific team, the paper proposes a series of hypotheses to better understand how these factors influence individuals' team selection decisions. The ultimate goal is to provide guidance for managers to enhance employee participation in voluntarily organized teams and to provide directions for future research.