Unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes and non-athletes

Yihong You,Yiming Ma,Zhiguang Ji,Fanying Meng,Anmin Li,Chunhua Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5548
IF: 3.061
2018-09-07
PeerJ
Abstract:Background Response inhibition is associated with successful sporting performance. However, research on response inhibition in athletes from open-skill sports has mainly focused on a consciously triggered variety; little is known about open-skill athletes’ response inhibition elicited by unconscious stimuli. Methods Here, we explored unconscious response inhibition differences between table tennis athletes ( n = 20) and non-athletes ( n = 19) using the masked go/no-go task and event-related potentials technique (ERPs). Results At the behavioral level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter go-response times (RTs) than non-athletes in the conscious condition. Furthermore, table tennis athletes exhibited longer response time–slowing (RT-slowing) than non-athletes in the unconscious condition. At the neural level, table tennis athletes displayed shorter event-related potential N2 component latencies than non-athletes for all conditions. More importantly, athletes displayed larger no-go event-related potential P3 component amplitudes than non-athletes at both the conscious and unconscious levels. Discussion The present study results suggested that table tennis athletes have superior conscious and unconscious response inhibition compared to non-athletes.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?