Abstract:To establish a stable and sensitive experience of the world, the brain tends to use recent history when forming perceptual decisions. This results in serial dependence in perception, by which previous trials affect the current perception. The serial dependence effect can be divided into ( at least) two categories: the effect of previous stimuli (i. e., the stimulus serial dependence effect) and the effect of previous decisions ( i.e., the decisional serial dependence effect) on the current perception. Although separate stimulus and decisional serial dependence effects have been demonstrated in duration perception, their spatial selectivity is unclear. In the present study, we investigated whether and how serial dependence in duration perception generalizes across different visual positions of stimuli. The modified temporal bisection task was used in three experiments. Specifically, 24 naive volunteers participated in Experiment 1. During the experiment, the visual stimulus (a white Gaussian blob) was pseudorandomly presented in the central or peripheral ( 10 degrees from the left fixation) visual field. Participants were asked to judge whether the duration of the test stimulus (i.e., 300, 395, 520, 684, or 900 ms) was shorter or longer than a reference stimulus of intermediate duration (i.e., 520 ms) once the test stimulus disappeared. A group of 23 new volunteers were recruited for Experiment 2. The task of Experiment 2 was similar to that of Experiment 1, except that the visual stimulus was pseudorandomly located at either 5 degrees to the left or 5 degrees to the right of the central fixation. A new set of 24 volunteers participated in Experiment 3, in which the positions of both the fixation and the visual stimulus were changed; there were thus four types of positional relationships between stimuli across trials ( i.e., identity, retinal position change, external position change, and both changes). The results showed that previous stimulus duration and previous choice exerted opposing effects on serial dependence of duration perception: specifically, a repulsive stimulus serial dependence and an attractive decisional serial dependence. In other words, current duration estimates were repelled away from the previous trial's stimulus duration but attracted toward the previous choice. We found these effects in both the central and peripheral visual fields. More importantly, we found that the stimulus serial dependence effect was not constrained by the visual position of the stimuli: the effects were comparable between contexts in which the stimulus positions of previous and current trials were the same and when they were different. The effects fully transferred across the central and peripheral visual fields, across the left and right visual hemifields, and across different external spaces. However, we found that the decisional serial dependence effect was larger in the position-consistent context than in the position-inconsistent context. This indicates that the decisional serial dependence effect could only be partially transferred across different visual positions regardless of the types of positions ( i.e., spatiotopic vs. retinotopic). These results provide evidence that both previous stimuli duration and previous choices affect subsequent perceptual decisions about duration, resulting in repulsive and attractive serial dependence effects, respectively. The repulsive stimulus serial dependence effect fully generalizes across different visual positions, suggesting it occurs primarily in higher-level visual areas. This also implies the existence of fast-duration adaptation. The attractive decisional serial dependence effect suggests that there is decision inertia in perceptual choices. Moreover, this effect is partly contingent on the visual position, which may result from the category organization function of higher-order brain areas. This suggests that the brain takes advantage of the visual position context when forming the decisional prior. These findings are helpful for understanding the plasticity of duration perception.

Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex

Task feedback suggests a post-perceptual component to serial dependence

Perceptual confirmation bias and decision bias underlie adaptation to sequential regularities

Spatial generalization of serial dependence in visual duration perception

Serial dependence in numerosity perception

Long-term priors influence visual perception through recruitment of long-range feedback

Seeing with Prejudice: Inherent Biases in Connectivity Between Oriented and Luxotonic Cells

Reactivated past decisions repel early sensory processing and attract late decision-making

Temporal regularities shape perceptual decisions and striatal dopamine signals

Neural evidence for decision-making underlying attractive serial dependence

Continuity fields enhance visual perception through positive serial dependence

Individual differences reveal similarities in serial dependencies across perceptual tasks, but no relation to serial dependencies for oculomotor behavior

Asymmetric stimulus representations bias visual perceptual learning

Serial Dependence in Timing at the Perceptual Level Being Modulated by Working Memory

Integrated Perceptual Decisions Rely on Parallel Evidence Accumulation

History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors

Memory reports are biased by all relevant contents of working memory

Representation of a Perceptual Bias in the Prefrontal Cortex

Temporal Asymmetry in Dark-Bright Processing Initiates Propagating Activity across Primary Visual Cortex

Top-Down Control of Visual Perception: Attention in Natural Vision

Stimulus-choice (mis)alignment in primate MT cortex