Abstract:Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) technique is widely used for protein structure determination. Current automatic cryo-EM protein complex modeling methods mostly rely on prior chain separation. However, chain separation without sequence guidance often suffers from errors caused by cross-chain interaction or noise densities, which would accumulate and mislead the subsequent steps. Here, we present EModelX, a fully automated cryo-EM protein complex structure modeling method, which achieves sequence-guiding modeling through cross-modal alignments between cryo-EM maps and protein sequences. EModelX first employs multi-task deep learning to predict Cα atoms, backbone atoms, and amino acid types from cryo-EM maps, which is subsequently used to sample Cα traces with amino acid profiles. The profiles are then aligned with protein sequences to obtain initial structural models, which yielded an average RMSD of 1.17 Å in our test set, approaching atomic-level precision in recovering PDB-deposited structures. After filling unmodeled gaps through sequence-guiding Cα threading, the final models achieved an average TM-score of 0.808, outperforming the state-of-the-art method. The further combination with AlphaFold can improve the average TM-score to 0.911. Analyzes conducted by comparing some EModelX-built models and PDB structures highlight its potential to improve PDB structures. EModelX is accessible at https://bio-web1.nscc-gz.cn/app/EModelX .

Correction: Giri et al. Improving Protein-Ligand Interaction Modeling with cryo-EM Data, Templates, and Deep Learning in 2021 Ligand Model Challenge. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 132

Corrigendum for “A Novel Kinase Subverts Aluminium Resistance by Boosting Ornithine Decarboxylase‐dependent Putrescine Biosynthesis”

Erratum: Histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation modulates long-range chromatin interactions at enhancers

Erratum: Adding an Unnatural Covalent Bond to Proteins Through Proximity-Enhanced Bioreactivity

Outcomes of the EMDataResource cryo-EM Ligand Modeling Challenge

Author Correction: Cryo-EM structure of the exocyst complex

Author Correction: Structural insights into the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors

Correction: Reyes Romero et al. Computer- and NMR-Aided Design of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Hub1 Protein. Molecules 2022, 27, 8282

Publisher Correction: Multi-experiment Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling of Single-Cell Translation Kinetics after Transfection

Author Correction: Cryo-EM structures of PAC1 receptor reveal ligand binding mechanism

Author Correction: Cryo-EM structure and biochemical analysis reveal the basis of the functional difference between human PI3KC3-C1 and -C2

Protein complex structure modeling by cross-modal alignment between cryo-EM maps and protein sequences

Erratum: Structure of the Complete Dimeric Human GDAP1 Core Domain Provides Insights Into Ligand Binding and Clustering of Disease Mutations

Author Correction: Cryo-EM structure of trimeric Mycobacterium smegmatis succinate dehydrogenase with a membrane-anchor SdhF

Correction: Corrigendum: Protein-structure-guided Discovery of Functional Mutations Across 19 Cancer Types

Predictive modeling and cryo-EM: A synergistic approach to modeling macromolecular structure

Correction: Three-dimensional Protein Assemblies Directed by Orthogonal Non-Covalent Interactions

Corrigendum to "Addressing docking pose selection with structure-based deep learning: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities" [Comput Struct Biotechnol J vol. 23 (2024) 2141-2151]

Erratum: To What Extent Do Fluorophores Bias the Biological Activity of Peptides? A Practical Approach Using Membrane-Active Peptides as Models

Correction: Single-molecule FRET and conformational analysis of beta-arrestin-1 through genetic code expansion and a Se-click reaction

Erratum: No country for old methods: New tools for studying microproteins