Abstract:A cardiovascular disease polygenic risk score (CVD-PRS) can stratify individuals into different categories of cardiovascular risk, but whether the addition of a CVD-PRS to clinical risk scores improves the identification of individuals at increased risk in a real-world clinical setting is unknown. The Genetics and the Vascular Health Check Study (GENVASC) was embedded within the UK National Health Service Health Check (NHSHC) programme which invites individuals between 40–74 years of age without known CVD to attend an assessment in a UK general practice where CVD risk factors are measured and a CVD risk score (QRISK2) is calculated. Between 2012–2020, 44,141 individuals (55.7% females, 15.8% non-white) who attended an NHSHC in 147 participating practices across two counties in England were recruited and followed. When 195 individuals (cases) had suffered a major CVD event (CVD death, myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularisation, stroke), 396 propensity-matched controls with a similar risk profile were identified, and a nested case-control genetic study undertaken to see if the addition of a CVD-PRS to QRISK2 in the form of an integrated risk tool (IRT) combined with QRISK2 would have identified more individuals at the time of their NHSHC as at high risk (QRISK2 10-year CVD risk of ≥10%), compared with QRISK2 alone. The distribution of the standardised CVD-PRS was significantly different in cases compared with controls (cases mean score .32; controls, −.18, P = 8.28×10 −9 ). QRISK2 identified 61.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.3%–68.4%) of individuals who subsequently developed a major CVD event as being at high risk at their NHSHC, while the combination of QRISK2 and IRT identified 68.7% (95% CI: 61.7%–75.2%), a relative increase of 11.7% ( P = 1×10 −4 ). The odds ratio (OR) of being up-classified was 2.41 (95% CI: 1.03–5.64, P = .031) for cases compared with controls. In individuals aged 40–54 years, QRISK2 identified 26.0% (95% CI: 16.5%–37.6%) of those who developed a major CVD event, while the combination of QRISK2 and IRT identified 38.4% (95% CI: 27.2%–50.5%), indicating a stronger relative increase of 47.7% in the younger age group ( P = .001). The combination of QRISK2 and IRT increased the proportion of additional cases identified similarly in women as in men, and in non-white ethnicities compared with white ethnicity. The findings were similar when the CVD-PRS was added to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease pooled cohort equations (ASCVD-PCE) or SCORE2 clinical scores. In a clinical setting, the addition of genetic information to clinical risk assessment significantly improved the identification of individuals who went on to have a major CVD event as being at high risk, especially among younger individuals. The findings provide important real-world evidence of the potential value of implementing a CVD-PRS into health systems. GENVASC design and key findings: The GENVASC study was set up to evaluate whether the addition of a polygenic risk score for cardiovascular disease (CVD-PRS) to clinical risk assessment at an NHS Health Check would increase the number of individuals who went to have a major CVD event as being at high risk at their health check. 44 141 individuals free of CVD were recruited at their NHS Health Check and when 195 CVD events had occurred during follow-up, a retrospective case-control study was undertaken to see how many additional individuals would have been identified as high risk at their health check by the addition of the CVD-PRS in the form of an integrated risk tool (IRT) to assessment by the clinical risk score (QRISK2) alone.

Integration of a polygenic score into guideline-recommended prediction of cardiovascular disease

Combining European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association risk prediction model with polygenic risk scores to refine cardiovascular prevention

Polygenic risk score adds to a clinical risk score in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in a clinical setting

Polygenic Risk Scores: The Next Step for Improved Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease?

Cardiovascular risk prediction using metabolomic biomarkers and polygenic risk scores: a cohort study and modelling analyses

Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of cardiometabolic disease

A polygenic risk score improves risk stratification of coronary artery disease: a large-scale prospective Chinese cohort study

Current State and Future of Polygenic Risk Scores in Cardiometabolic Disease: A Scoping Review

Polygenic Risk Score to Identify Subclinical Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Young Adults

Polygenic Risk, Rare Variants, and Family History: Independent and Additive Effects on Coronary Heart Disease

Incremental Prognostic Value of a Coronary Heart Disease Polygenic Risk Score in Type 2 Diabetes

Risk assessment for colorectal cancer via polygenic risk score and lifestyle exposure: a large-scale association study of East Asian and European populations

Clinical use of polygenic risk scores for detection of peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular events

The current state and future of cardiometabolic polygenic risk scores in European and non-European population cohorts

Identifying and characterizing disease subpopulations that most benefit from polygenic risk scores

Polygenic Risk Scores in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease in Symptomatic Patients. A Validation Study

Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease Based on an Ancestrally Diverse Genome-Wide Association Study and Population-Specific Optimization

Development of a Polygenic Risk Score to Improve Detection of Peripheral Artery Disease

Polygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments

Integration of biomarker polygenic risk score improves prediction of coronary heart disease in UK Biobank and FinnGen