Abstract:Research points to the positive impact that gender-segregated schooling and classroom initiatives exert on academic attainment. An evaluation of these studies which reveal positive effects highlights, however, that students are typically selectively assigned to single- or mixed-gender instructional settings, presenting a methodological confound. The current study controls for students' prior attainment to appraise the efficacy of a single-gender classroom initiative implemented in a co-educational high school in the United Kingdom. Secondary data analysis (using archived data) was performed on 266 middle-ability, 11-12 year-old students' standardized test scores in Languages (English, foreign language), STEM-related (Mathematics, Science, Information and Communication Technology), and Non-STEM subjects (art, music, drama). Ninety-eight students (54, 55% female) were taught in single-gender and 168 (69, 41% female) in mixed-gender classrooms. Students undertook identical tests irrespective of classroom type, which were graded in accordance with U.K national curriculum guidelines. Controlling for students' prior attainment, findings indicate that students do not appear to benefit from being taught in single-gender relative to mixed-gender classrooms in Language and STEM-related subjects. Young women benefitted from being taught in mixed-gender relative to single-gender classes for Non-STEM subjects. However, when prior ability is not controlled for, the intervention appears to be effective for all school subjects, highlighting the confounding influence of selective admissions. These findings suggest that gender-segregated classroom initiatives may not bolster students' grades. It is argued that studies that do not control for selection effects may tell us little about the effectiveness of such interventions on scholastic achievement.

Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement

We Can't Change What We Don't Recognize: Understanding the Special Needs of Gifted Females

Influences on Career Development for Gifted Adolescent Girls in Selective Academic Programs in Australia

Gender, culture, and mathematics performance

Talent Ignored, Talent Diverted: The Cultural Context Underlying Giftedness in Females

Brief Stories of Successful Female Role Models in Science Help Counter Gender Stereotypes Regarding Intellectual Ability among Young Girls: A Pilot Study

Egalitarian gender role attitudes give girls the edge: Exploring the role of students' gender role attitudes in reading and math

Controlling for Prior Attainment Reduces the Positive Influence that Single-Gender Classroom Initiatives Exert on High School Students' Scholastic Achievements

Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

The gender role and career self-efficacy of gifted girls in STEM areas

Gender-fair assessment of young gifted students’ scientific thinking skills

Why are there no girls? Increasing children's recognition of structural causes of the gender gap in STEM

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

Which Boys and Which Girls Are Falling Behind? Linking Adolescents’ Gender Role Profiles to Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement

Parent and Teacher Depictions of Gender Gaps in Secondary Student Appraisals of Their Academic Competences

Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

National disparities favoring males are reflected in girls' implicit associations about gender and academic subjects

The gender gap in sport performance: equity influences equality.

Grade and Gender Differences in Gifted Students' Self-Concepts

Gender Differences in Academic Achievement: Is Writing an Exception to the Gender Similarities Hypothesis?

Comparing Perfectionism, Cognitive Mindset, Constructive Thinking, and Emotional Intelligence in Gifted Students by Grade and Gender