Impact of risk oversight functions on bank risk: Evidence from the Dodd-Frank Act

Lakshmi Balasubramanyan,Naveen D. Daniel,Joseph G Haubrich,Lalitha Naveen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.107049
IF: 3.539
2024-01-01
Journal of Banking & Finance
Abstract:We document the impact of having a risk committee (RC) and a chief risk officer (CRO) on bank risk using the passage of the Dodd Frank Act as a natural experiment.  The Act requires bank holding companies with over $10B of assets to have an RC to oversee risk management, while those with over $50B of assets are additionally required to have a CRO.  We use difference-in-difference and regression discontinuity approaches to estimate the change in risk following RC and CRO adoption. Overall, we find no evidence that the RC or CRO have a causal impact on bank risk.
economics,business, finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?