How should China prioritize the deregulation of electricity prices in the context of carbon pricing? A computable general equilibrium analysis

Kun Zhang,Yun-Fei Yao,Qiao-Mei Liang,Gaowa Saren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105187

IF: 12.8

2021-04-01

Energy Economics

Abstract:<p>China formally launched a national carbon trading market in the power sector in 2017. However, electricity prices in China are still subject to government regulation, which reduces the cost-effectiveness of the carbon pricing policy. This study uses a computable general equilibrium model to explore how China's electricity prices can be deregulated in two stages in the context of implementing carbon pricing in the electricity sector. The results show that under different government policy objectives, the choice of electricity price deregulation is different. If the government intends to significantly reduce marginal abatement costs and promote carbon emission reductions, the electricity price deregulation of non-key electricity consumption sectors should be prioritized in the first stage and that of the national protected sectors in the second stage. Conversely, if the government intends to reduce GDP losses, households' disposable income, and welfare losses effectively, the liberalization of the electricity prices of key electricity consumption sectors should be prioritized in the first stage and that of the household sector in the second stage. Taking 50% of the reduction targets in the electricity sector as an example, if the key electricity consumption sectors and households are prioritized, GDP losses are reduced by 3.6% and 13%, respectively. The results of this study provide new information for China to implement electricity market reform in the context of carbon pricing.</p>

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is how China can give priority to electricity price reform in the context of carbon pricing to improve the efficiency of emission reduction while reducing the negative economic impacts of carbon - pricing policies. Specifically, the study uses a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to explore how China's electricity prices should be gradually market - oriented in stages under different government policy goals. The issues of concern in the study include:

1. **Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC)**: What are the impacts of electricity price marketization on the marginal abatement costs of the power sector and the whole country?
2. **Macroeconomic impacts**: What are the impacts of electricity price marketization on GDP, household disposable income and welfare?
3. **Sector - specific impacts**: How do different industries perform during the process of electricity price marketization?

By analyzing these aspects, the paper aims to provide specific decision - support for China's power market reform in the context of carbon pricing. Specifically, the paper explores the following two main issues:

- If the government hopes to significantly reduce marginal abatement costs and promote carbon emission reduction, in which sectors should electricity price marketization be given priority?
- If the government hopes to effectively reduce GDP losses, household disposable income losses and welfare losses, in which sectors should electricity price marketization be given priority?

The research results show that different policy goals will lead to different priorities for electricity price marketization. For example, if the government's goal is to significantly reduce marginal abatement costs and promote carbon emission reduction, electricity price marketization should first be carried out in non - critical electricity - consuming sectors and then in state - protected sectors. Conversely, if the government's goal is to reduce GDP losses, household disposable income losses and welfare losses, electricity price marketization should first be carried out in critical electricity - consuming sectors and then in the household sector.