Abstract:Biological systems differ from the inanimate world in their behaviors ranging from simple movements to coordinated purposeful actions by large groups of muscles, to perception of the world based on signals of different modalities, to cognitive acts, and to the role of self-imposed constraints such as laws of ethics. Respectively, depending on the behavior of interest, studies of biological objects based on laws of nature (physics) have to deal with different salient sets of variables and parameters. Understanding is a high-level concept, and its analysis has been linked to other high-level concepts such as “mental model” and “meaning”. Attempts to analyze understanding based on laws of nature are an example of the top-down approach. Studies of the neural control of movements represent an opposite, bottom-up approach, which starts at the interface with classical physics of the inanimate world and operates with traditional concepts such as forces, coordinates, etc. There are common features shared by the two approaches. In particular, both assume organizations of large groups of elements into task-specific groups, which can be described with only a handful of salient variables. Both assume optimality criteria that allow the emergence of families of solutions to typical tasks. Both assume predictive processes reflected in anticipatory adjustments to actions (motor and non-motor). Both recognize the importance of generating dynamically stable solutions. The recent progress in studies of the neural control of movements has led to a theory of hierarchical control with spatial referent coordinates for the effectors. This theory, in combination with the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis, allows quantifying the stability of actions with respect to salient variables. This approach has been used in the analysis of motor learning, changes in movements with typical and atypical development and with aging, and impaired actions by patients with various neurological disorders. It has been developed to address issues of kinesthetic perception. There seems to be hope that the two counter-directional approaches will meet and result in a single theoretical scheme encompassing biological phenomena from figuring out the best next move in a chess position to activating motor units appropriate for implementing that move on the chessboard.

Terra incognita of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM)

Understanding and Synergy: A Single Concept at Different Levels of Analysis?

Spatial and Temporal Muscle Synergies Provide a Dual Characterization of Low-dimensional and Intermittent Control of Upper-limb Movements

Synergistic control of hand position, velocity, and acceleration fluctuates across time during simulated Nordic skiing

Neurophysiology of unimanual motor control and mirror movements

Intramuscle Synergies: Their Place in the Neural Control Hierarchy

Motor unit-based synergies in a non-compartmentalized muscle

Model Predictive Control of the Neural Manifold

Affordances for throwing: An uncontrolled manifold analysis

Integrating across behaviors and timescales to understand the neural control of movement

On Human Motor Coordination: The Synergy Expansion Hypothesis

The Volitional Control of Individual Motor Units Is Constrained within Low-Dimensional Neural Manifolds by Common Inputs

Differential Impact of Biomechanical Constraints on Control Signal Dimensionality for Gravity Support Versus Propulsion

Modular Organization of Muscle Synergies to Achieve Movement Behaviors.

Unified Multi-Rate Control: from Low Level Actuation to High Level Planning

Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination

Flexible Control of Motor Units: Is the Multidimensionality of Motor Unit Manifolds a Sufficient Condition?

Behavioral Motor Performance

Using a System Identification Approach to Investigate Subtask Control during Human Locomotion

Three levels of neural control contributing to performance-stabilizing synergies in multi-finger tasks