Abstract:Abstract The vital role of healthcare financing in achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is indisputable. However, most countries, including Malaysia, face challenges in establishing an equitable and sustainable healthcare financing system due to escalating healthcare costs, an ageing population, and a growing disease burden. With desirable pre-payment and risk pooling features, private health insurance (PHI) is considered an alternative financing option to reduce out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure. However, ongoing theoretical and empirical debates persist regarding the adequacy of financial risk protection provided by PHI largely because it depends on its role, the benefit design, and the regulations in place. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of supplementary PHI on OOP inpatient medical expenditure in Malaysia. Secondary data analysis was conducted using the Malaysian National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019 dataset. A total of 983 respondents with a history of inpatient hospitalization in the past 12 months were included in the study. Instrumental variable (IV) analysis using a two-stage residual inclusion was performed to address endogeneity bias, with wealth status and education level as the IVs. Tobit regression model was used in the second stage considering the censored distribution of the outcome variable. Missing data was handled using multiple imputation. About one-fifth of the respondents had PHI. In this study, we found that having PHI significantly increased OOP inpatient medical expenditure in all three marginal effects. Additionally, age, residential location, ethnicity(citizenship), being covered by government guarantee letter, government funding, and employer-sponsored health insurance were other significant factors associated with OOP inpatient medical expenditure. Our findings undermine a key justification to advocate PHI uptake among the population, with a need for the Malaysian government to reassess the role of PHI in healthcare financing and reconsider PHI subsidization policy. Regulations should also be strengthened to enhance the financial risk protection provided by PHI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the impact of supplementary private health insurance (PHI) on out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses in Malaysia. Specifically, the study aims to explore whether having supplementary PHI can effectively reduce patients' out-of-pocket medical expenses, thereby providing adequate financial risk protection.
### Background and Issues
1. **Background**:
- Establishing a fair and sustainable healthcare financing system is key to achieving universal health coverage (UHC).
- Countries like Malaysia face challenges such as rising healthcare costs, an aging population, and an increasing disease burden, making it difficult to establish a fair and sustainable healthcare financing system.
- Private health insurance (PHI), with its characteristics of prepayment and risk pooling, is considered an alternative financing option to reduce out-of-pocket medical expenses.
- However, there is theoretical and empirical debate about the effectiveness of the financial risk protection provided by PHI, depending on its role, benefit design, and regulatory framework.
2. **Issues**:
- Can supplementary PHI effectively reduce out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses?
- Are the design and regulation of PHIs sufficient to provide adequate financial risk protection?
- Should the Malaysian government continue to encourage and subsidize the purchase of PHI?
### Research Objectives
- **Primary Objective**: To assess the impact of supplementary PHI on out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses in Malaysia, thereby evaluating the effectiveness of the financial risk protection it provides.
- **Secondary Objectives**: To explore the impact of other factors (such as age, residence, ethnicity, government guarantee letters, government funding, and employer-provided health insurance) on out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses.
### Methods
- **Data Source**: Data from the 2019 National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS 2019) in Malaysia.
- **Sample**: Includes 983 respondents with a history of hospitalization in the past 12 months.
- **Statistical Methods**:
- Using the two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) method in instrumental variable analysis (IV analysis) to address endogeneity bias.
- Employing a Tobit regression model to handle the censored distribution of the dependent variable (out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses).
- Instrumental variables include education level and household income.
### Results
- **Main Findings**: Having supplementary PHI significantly increased out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses.
- **Other Significant Factors**: Age, residence, ethnicity, government guarantee letters, government funding, and employer-provided health insurance were also significantly associated with out-of-pocket inpatient medical expenses.
### Conclusion
- **Policy Recommendations**:
- The findings question the rationale of promoting PHI as a primary means to alleviate out-of-pocket medical expenses.
- The Malaysian government needs to reassess the role of PHI in healthcare financing and reconsider the PHI subsidy policy.
- Strengthening the regulation of PHI is necessary to improve its financial risk protection effectiveness.
- Despite fiscal pressures, relying on PHI to achieve universal health coverage should be cautiously considered.
Through these research findings, the authors hope to provide references for policymakers in Malaysia and other countries, helping them make more reasonable healthcare financing decisions in the face of fiscal constraints.