SNOT‐22 subdomain outcomes following treatment for sinonasal malignancy: A prospective, multicenter study

David R. Grimm,Daniel M. Beswick,Sabrina L. Maoz,Eric W. Wang,Garret W. Choby,Edward C. Kuan,Erik P. Chan,Nithin D. Adappa,Mathew Geltzeiler,Anne E. Getz,Ian M. Humphreys,Christopher H. Le,Waleed M. Abuzeid,Eugene H. Chang,Aria Jafari,Todd T. Kingdom,Michael A. Kohanski,Jivianne K. Lee,Jayakar V. Nayak,James N. Palmer,Zara M. Patel,Carlos D. Pinheiro‐Neto,Adam C. Resnick,Myung S. Sim,Timothy L. Smith,Carl H. Snyderman,Maie A. John,Phillip Storm,Jeffrey D. Suh,Marilene B. Wang,Peter H. Hwang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23338
2024-02-21
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Abstract:Background Patients with sinonasal malignancy (SNM) present with significant sinonasal quality of life (QOL) impairment. Global sinonasal QOL as measured by the 22‐item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT‐22) has been shown to improve with treatment. This study aims to characterize SNOT‐22 subdomain outcomes in SNM. Methods Patients diagnosed with SNM were prospectively enrolled in a multi‐center patient registry. SNOT‐22 scores were collected at the time of diagnosis and through the post‐treatment period for up to 5 years. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify drivers of variation in SNOT‐22 subdomains. Results Note that 234 patients were reviewed, with a mean follow‐up of 22 months (3 months–64 months). Rhinologic, psychological, and sleep subdomains significantly improved versus baseline (all p
otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?