Thoracentesis techniques: A literature review

Asna Mohammed,Uri Hochfeld,Sung Hong,Davood K. Hosseini,Kevin Kim,Karan Omidvari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036850

IF: 1.6

2024-01-11

Medicine

Abstract:Thoracentesis is a diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure performed by aspiration of fluid from the pleural space. The procedure is performed by 1 of 4 methods: manual suction via syringe, gravity drainage, using continuous suction from a vacuum bottle, or using continuous suction through a wall system. There are currently no clear guidelines or standard of care on which method to use and it is largely preference based with institutional variations and limitations. While a relatively low-risk procedure, major complications include pneumothorax, re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE) and bleeding that can lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. [ 1 , 2 ] Patients can also experience minor complications including symptoms of chest discomfort, shortness of breath and cough during or after the procedure. There are various proposed factors associated with complications including, underlying etiology, history of bleeding disorders, coagulopathy, the method used, the amount and the speed of fluid removal, and the negative pressure created during the procedure. There have only been few studies that explore the relation between complications of thoracentesis with the mode of fluid removal. We aim to review whether the mode of drainage during thoracentesis affects the rate of complications.

medicine, general & internal