Comparative analysis of subclassification models in patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC B) receiving systemic therapy

L. Ielasi,B. Stefanini,F. Conti,M. Tonnini,R. Tortora,G. Magini,R. Sacco,T. Pressiani,F. Trevisani,F.G. Foschi,F. Piscaglia,A. Granito,F. Tovoli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.148
IF: 5.165
2024-02-01
Digestive and Liver Disease
Abstract:Introduction Intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC B HCC) is a heterogeneous group of patients that could be addressed to a wide spectrum of treatments and, consequently, survival significantly varies among patients. In the last decades, several subclassification systems have been proposed to stratify patients’ prognosis. We analyzed and compared these systems (Bolondi, Yamakado, Kinki, Wang, Lee, and Kim criteria) in patients undergoing systemic therapy. Materials and Methods We considered 171 patients with BCLC B HCC treated with sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy in six different Italian centers from 2010 to 2021 and retrospectively applied criteria of six different subclassification systems. Results Except for Yamakado criteria, all the subclassification systems showed a statistically significant correlation to overall survival (OS). In the postestimation analysis Bolondi criteria (OS of subgroup 22.5, 11.9 and 6.6 mo, respectively; C-index 0.586; AIC 1338; BIC 1344) and Wang criteria (OS of subgroups 20.6, 11.9 and 7.0, respectively; C-index 0.607; AIC 1337; BIC 1344) presented the best accuracy. Further analyses on these two subclassification systems implemented with the prognostic factor of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/ml have shown an increase of accuracy for both systems (C-index 0.599 and 0.624, respectively). Conclusions Intermediate stage subclassification systems maintain their predictive value also in the setting of systemic therapy. Bolondi and Wang criteria showed the highest accuracy. AFP >400 ng/ml enhance the performance of these systems.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?