Abstract:Eutrophication has been a major environmental issue in many coastal and inland ecosystems, which is primarily attributed to excessive anthropogenic inputs of nutrients. Restoration efforts have therefore focused on the reduction of watershed nutrient loads, including in the Chesapeake Bay (USA). To facilitate watershed management, watershed models are often developed and used to assess the expected impact of scenarios of past and future management policies and practices and the impact of watershed conditions. However, the level of load reductions estimated using monitoring data often does not match with model predictions, which may cast doubt on the effectiveness of the restoration efforts, the reliability of the model, and the prospect of achieving pre-established reduction goals. To better reconcile such inconsistencies between expectation (i.e., modeling estimates) and reality (i.e., monitoring information), a watershed-wide indicator was developed for the Chesapeake Bay watershed to explicitly quantify the progress toward nutrient reduction goals in the context of the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). Results of the indicator show that since 1995 long-term progress has been made toward the TMDL planning targets for both nitrogen and phosphorus. Specifically, management practices that are implemented and realized (in monitoring data) have been increasing over time, whereas management practices that need to be implemented in the future to meet the goals have been decreasing. In addition, the progress of nutrient reduction toward meeting the goals has varied with source sectors and watershed locations: i.e., point source management has been fully or nearly fully implemented, whereas nonpoint source management has been implemented by 50%-70%. In summary, this indicator, which is largely based on monitoring data, can provide at least four benefits: (1) evaluating the validity of the modeled estimates of nutrient reductions by comparing them to monitoring information; (2) placing the monitored riverine trends into a management context; (3) comparing progress between different nutrient source sectors and watershed locations; and (4) facilitating communication of the progress to the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership and the public. Although we focus on the indicator development and interpretation for the Chesapeake Bay watershed, the framework can be transferred to watersheds within and beyond this watershed, where similar modeling and monitoring information exists, to gauge expectations on the trajectory and pace of the progress toward meeting restoration goals.

Collective Identity: Making the Case for a Stage Model Approach to Addressing Water Quality in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

A hydrodynamic model–based approach to assess sampling approaches for dissolved oxygen criteria in the Chesapeake Bay

Aquatic Landscapes: The Importance of Integrating Waters

Building local community commitment to wetlands restoration: a case study of the Cache River Wetlands in southern Illinois, USA

Sediment dynamics and implications for management: State of the science from long‐term research in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA

Interaction design of community-driven environmental projects (CDEPs): A case study from the Anacostia Watershed

Participatory science methods to monitor water quality and ground truth remote sensing of the Chesapeake Bay

Prioritizing Stream Protection, Restoration and Management Actions Using Landscape Modeling and Spatial Analysis

The state of water quality strategies in the Mississippi River Basin: Is cooperative federalism working?

Defining Cultural Resources: A Case Study from the Mid-Atlantic United States

The Clearinghouse Approach to Enhancing Informed Public Participation in Watershed Management Utilizing GIS and Internet Technology

Perspectives on valuing water quality improvements using stated preference methods

The Importance of Capacity-Building in Watershed Groups: Lessons from the Hudson River Watershed, USA

Using the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change to Explore Forest Landowner Perspectives on Water Quality

Integrating monitoring and modeling information to develop an indicator of watershed progress toward nutrient reduction goals

An Integrated Assessment Model for Valuing Water Quality Changes in the United States

On the banks of the Red Cedar: toward socio-ecologically robust riparian management in an iconic Michigan river

Watershed Science: Coupling hydrological science and water resources management

A Conceptual Framework for Social, Behavioral, and Environmental Change through Stakeholder Engagement in Water Resource Management

Appraising Human Impact on Watersheds: The Feasibility of Training Citizen Scientists to make Qualitative Judgments

Designing Solutions for Clean Water on Cape Cod: Engaging Communities to Improve Decision Making