Abstract:Outcomes 1. Understand the importance of integrating patient values into treatment decisions for women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. 2. Articulate the domains that were identified for the 13 diverse participants. Key Message Incorporating values into shared decision-making is important for anyone with a metastatic cancer diagnosis, but especially for women who identify as Black/African American, Latinx, or Native American; studies suggest these groups are at risk for poor prognosis communication, worse outcomes, and are more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Importance Treatment decision-making for individuals with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is often guided by oncology clinicians' belief that patients value life prolongation above all other goals. Current cancer care does not include standardized integration of patient values, although values assessment tools can improve shared decision-making conversations and the quality of cancer care. Objective(s) We aim to develop a values assessment tool (VAsT) for treatment decision-making in a diverse sample of women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC), and conducted initial concept elicitation interviews to identify the most relevant domains in making treatment decisions. Scientific Methods Utilized A purposive sample of 13 participants (46% Black/African American, Latina, Native American or mixed race) were recruited from ambulatory oncology clinics at two comprehensive cancer centers. Interviews were conducted to establish the domain validity of VAsT and relevance for women with mBC. Interviews focused on eliciting concepts that influenced treatment decision-making, how and whether they were communicated, and the role of social support, finances, culture, and religion. Additional inquiry included to what extent they felt they had participated in the treatment decisions, and to what extent their values were communicated to clinicians. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and data were analyzed following a coding-based thematic analysis. Results A purposive sample of 13 participants (46% Black/African American, Latina, Native American or mixed race) were recruited from ambulatory oncology clinics at two comprehensive cancer centers. The results of preliminary thematic coding analysis include themes of the importance of prioritizing quality of life over duration (i.e., quantity), treatment considerations that allow them not to appear sick in front of children/grandchildren (e.g., loss of hair), financial considerations, ensuring the lowest burden for their caregivers/loved ones, and valuation of faith. Most participants said their clinicians did not ask them about their personal values or preferences related to treatment. Specifically, participants advised their clinicians to ask about their values as a regular component of their treatment because patients' priorities for treatment decisions shift or change over time. Conclusion(s) Our findings support the content domains for the VAsT in a small but racially and ethnically diverse sample of women with mBC. Further development of the VAsT items with cognitive interviews with caregivers and pilot testing in a real-world clinical environment is the next step. We anticipate the VAST will be effective at improving the standardization of communication for shared decision-making among women with mBC, their caregivers, and clinicians. Impact Research is needed to understand the patient, provider, and system barriers that limit patient engagement in treatment decision-making in clinical oncology practice. No prior studies have focused on evaluating the impact of values assessment in improving patient-centered communication in cancer care. Tools that facilitate communication have value for patients, caregivers, and clinicians because they support conversations addressing patients' uncertainty around treatment risks and benefits and facilitate treatment decisions.

Towards the Implementation of a Value Framework for Diagnostic Technologies: Operationalization, Piloting and Validation in Latin America.

A Systematic Review of Value Criteria for Next-Generation Sequencing/Comprehensive Genomic Profiling to Inform Value Framework Development

A Value Framework to Assess Patient-Facing Digital Health Technologies That Aim to Improve Chronic Disease Management: A Delphi Approach

Assessing the Value of Provider-Facing Digital Health Technologies Used in Chronic Disease Management: Toward a Value Framework Based on Multistakeholder Perceptions

Deliberative processes in decision making informed by health technology assessment in Latin America

Development of a Value Assessment Framework for Pediatric Health Technologies Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Expanding the Value Lens for Funding Decision Making

Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care

A Practical Framework for Value Creation in Health Information Systems From an Ecosystem Perspective: Evaluated in the South African Context

Design and implementation of a stakeholder consultation process for rapid health technology assessments in Argentina

Clinical Validation of Digital Healthcare Solutions: State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities

The Full Value of Vaccine Assessments Concept—Current Opportunities and Recommendations

Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Inform the Design of the Mobile Inspección Visual con Ácido Acético System: Mixed Methods Case Study

Systematic review on the implementation of metrological assurance systems for medical devices in Latin America

A simple and data-driven framework to foster multidisciplinary and timely care in resource-limited settings: A pilot program in Argentina.

How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review

Implementation of WHO guidelines for cervical cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment: knowledge and perceptions of health providers from Argentina

Rapid Diagnostic Test Value and Implementation in Antimicrobial Stewardship Across Low-to-Middle and High-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Review

Developing a Values Assessment Tool (VAsT) for women with metastatic breast cancer (GP117)

Analysis of the virtual healthcare model in Latin America: a systematic review of current challenges and barriers

WtsWrng Interim Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation and Description of the Challenges to Develop, Assess, and Introduce This Novel Digital Application in a Traditional Health System

Value based healthcare and Health Technology Assessment for emerging market countries: joint efforts to overcome barriers