Jerusalem Artichoke: Energy Balance in Annual and Perennial Cropping Systems—A Case Study in North-Eastern Poland

Krzysztof Józef Jankowski,Bożena Bogucka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112511
IF: 3.2
2024-05-24
Energies
Abstract:This article presents the results of a three-year experiment (2018–2020) conducted at the Agricultural Experiment Station in Bałcyny (north-eastern Poland) with the aim of determining Jerusalem artichoke (JA) yields and the energy balance of biomass production in (i) a perennial cropping system (only aerial biomass was harvested each year) and (ii) an annual cropping system (both aerial biomass and tubers were harvested each year). When JA was grown as a perennial crop, the demand for energy reached 25.2 GJ ha−1 in the year of plantation establishment and 12.3–13.4 GJ ha−1 in the second and third year of production. The energy inputs associated with the annual cropping system were determined in the range of 31.4–37.1 GJ ha−1. Biomass yields were twice as high in the annual than in the perennial cropping system (20.98 vs. 10.30 Mg DM ha−1). Tuber yield accounted for 46% of the total yield. The energy output of JA biomass was 1.8 times higher in the annual than in the perennial cropping system (275.4 vs. 157.3 GJ ha−1). The average energy gain in JA cultivation ranged from 140 (perennial crop) to 241 GJ ha−1 (annual crop). The energy efficiency ratio of JA biomass production reached 7.7–13.3 in the perennial cropping system, and it was 20% lower in the annual cropping system. These results imply that when JA was grown as an annual crop, an increase in energy inputs associated with plantation establishment (tillage and planting) and the harvest and transport of tubers was not fully compensated by the energy output of tubers.
energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of determining the differences in biomass yield and energy balance when Jerusalem Artichoke (JA) is cultivated as a perennial crop versus an annual crop in the northeastern region of Poland. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the energy input (EI), energy output (EO), energy gain (EG), and energy efficiency ratio (EER) of the two cropping systems to determine which is more energy-efficient. ### Research Background 1. **Energy Issues**: Global energy primarily relies on fossil fuels, which not only leads to increased greenhouse gas emissions but also threatens energy security. 2. **Demand for Renewable Energy**: To address climate change and the reduction of energy reserves, many countries are striving to diversify energy sources and develop the renewable energy market. 3. **Biomass Energy Potential**: Jerusalem Artichoke, as a high-yield lignocellulosic crop, has high biomass yield and diverse uses (such as producing solid fuel, biogas, and bioethanol), thus holding significant potential in the renewable energy field. ### Research Objectives 1. **Comparison of Two Cropping Systems**: Through a 3-year experiment, compare the biomass yield and energy balance of Jerusalem Artichoke as a perennial crop (harvesting only the above-ground parts) and as an annual crop (harvesting both the above-ground parts and tubers). 2. **Evaluation of Energy Efficiency**: Determine which cropping system performs better in terms of energy input, energy output, energy gain, and energy efficiency ratio. 3. **Environmental Impact**: Minimize the negative environmental impact of Jerusalem Artichoke cultivation by identifying processes that require less primary energy. ### Main Research Content 1. **Experimental Design**: Conducted at an agricultural experiment station in northeastern Poland, using a randomized block design, divided into perennial and annual cropping systems. 2. **Data Collection**: Recorded annual weather conditions, agricultural operations, biomass yield (fresh weight and dry weight), and energy input and output. 3. **Data Analysis**: Used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test to process the data. ### Key Results 1. **Energy Input**: The perennial cropping system had higher energy input in the first year of establishment but lower input in the subsequent 2 years. The annual cropping system consistently had higher energy input, especially in harvesting and transporting tubers. 2. **Biomass Yield**: The biomass yield of the annual cropping system was about twice that of the perennial cropping system. 3. **Energy Output**: The energy output of the annual cropping system was also significantly higher than that of the perennial cropping system. 4. **Energy Efficiency Ratio**: The energy efficiency ratio of the perennial cropping system was slightly higher than that of the annual cropping system, but the difference was not significant. ### Conclusion Although the annual cropping system had higher biomass yield and energy output, its higher energy input did not fully compensate for these gains. Therefore, from an energy efficiency perspective, the perennial cropping system may have an advantage. However, the specific choice of cropping system should also consider other factors such as land use, economic benefits, and environmental impact.