Abstract WP10: Impact of Dexmedetomidine in Neurocritical Care on Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion

Simon M Winzer,Haidar Moustafa,Daniela Schoene,Timo Siepmann,Volker Puetz,Kristian Barlinn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.wp10
IF: 10.17
2024-02-01
Stroke
Abstract:Introduction: While observational data suggest that dexmedetomidine may have neuroprotective effects on ischemic brain, its clinical use in acute ischemic stroke is limited due to concerns about cerebral vasoconstriction. We aimed to examine the impact of dexmedetomidine on outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) requiring neurocritical care after endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods: We extracted data from our stroke registry for consecutive patients with acLVO who underwent EVT and subsequent neurocritical care (12/2019-12/2022). Patients were categorized based on dexmedetomidine treatment. Intravenous dexmedetomidine was given alone or adjunctively for endotracheal tube intolerance, withdrawal symptoms, sedation transition and delirium. Primary outcomes were favorable functional status (mRS≤2) and mortality at 90 days. Results: Of 402 patients, 76 (18.9%) received dexmedetomidine after a median of 4 [3] days post-stroke. Dexmedetomidine-treated patients were more often male (63.2% vs. 45.4%; p=0.01), had higher baseline NIHSS scores (17 [7] vs. 15 [9.5]; p=0.001), lower baseline ASPECTS (7 [3] vs. 8 [2]; p<0.001) and higher diabetes prevalence (45.9% vs. 32.6%; p=0.045) compared to patients not exposed to dexmedetomidine. While favorable functional outcome was less frequently observed in the dexmedetomidine than in the comparator group (7.9% vs. 32.5%; p<0.001), there was no difference in 90-days mortality (40.8% vs. 28.8%; p=0.24). Adjusting for age, baseline NIHSS, IV thrombolysis, post-EVT reperfusion status and intubation for EVT, dexmedetomidine was associated with lower odds of favorable functional outcome (aOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.08-0.49). Among patients receiving dexmedetomidine within 72 hours post-stroke, no significant association with favorable functional outcome was found (aOR 0.55; 95%CI 0.19-1.62). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine could potentially have negative impacts on patients with acute ischemic stroke in neurocritical care. However, these results appear to be mainly related to delirium complications rather than critical vulnerability of ischemic stroke. Further research is warranted to elucidate the predictive role of dexmedetomidine in this patient population.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?