Abstract B033: Excessive Chimeric Antigen Receptor signaling correlates with poor clinical outcomes

Isabella Draper,Eric Bueter,Colleen Annesley,Corinne Summers,Rebecca Gardner,Stephen Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.tumimm24-b033
IF: 10.1
2024-10-19
Cancer Immunology Research
Abstract:While CAR-T clinical trials have seen promising results in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), unpredictable side effects, such as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity (ICANS), limit CAR-T cells from becoming a first line treatment. Different CAR designs produce different in-human responses, but extant preclinical assays largely fail to predict clinical responses and toxicity. Here, we present data from two independent studies in which we compared the molecular signal transduction profiles of well-performing vs poorly-performing CARs in the clinic. We identified a consistent set of protein-protein interactions that correlate with both poor response and toxicity in CAR trials. In study #1, healthy donor T cells expressing either the poorly performing anti-CD22 (IgG4 Hinge-CD28TM-41BB-CD3z) PLAT-04 CAR, or the better performing anti-CD22 (CD8 Hinge-CD8TM-41BB-CD3z) PLAT-07 CAR were stimulated for five minutes with CD22. Signal transduction was analyzed using Quantitative Multiplex Immunoprecipitation (QMI), an ELISA-like immunoassay, to quantify 400+ protein-protein interactions in CAR signal transduction. In study #2, patient-matched samples expressing murine scFv anti-CD19 (IgG4 Hinge-CD28TM-41BB-CD3z) PLAT-02 CAR or the more neurotoxic fully human scFv anti-CD19 (IgG4 Hinge-CD28-41BB-CD3z) PLAT-06 CAR were stimulated with CD19 for five minutes and signal transduction was analyzed by QMI. Despite reported poor expansion and clinical responses in patients, the PLAT-04 CAR signaled more strongly through ZAP70, TRAFs, and the LAT signalosome relative to the PLAT-07 CAR. The PLAT-06 CAR, which induced high rates of neurotoxicity in patients, also signaled more strongly through ZAP70, GRAP2, and TRAFs than the clinically successful and less toxic PLAT-02 CAR. LAT signalosome formation was similar in both the PLAT-06 and PLAT-02 CARs. These data suggest that poor CAR performance may stem from hyper-activated signaling. Both poorly-performing CARs, despite representing distinct outcomes (poor tumor killing or severe toxicity), signaled more strongly through T cell activating pathways than the optimal-performing CARs. These studies also suggest that variation in non-costimulatory CAR domains (scFv, hinge, TM) contribute to differential CAR signaling. Further studies correlating CAR design with signal transduction and clinical outcomes will allow for the design of safer and more effective CARs. Citation Format: Isabella Draper, Eric Bueter, Colleen Annesley, Corinne Summers, Rebecca Gardner, Stephen Smith. Excessive Chimeric Antigen Receptor signaling correlates with poor clinical outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2024 Oct 18-21; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2024;12(10 Suppl) nr B033.
oncology,immunology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?