Abstract:Abstract Introduction Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) face various psychological challenges throughout their clinical journey, mainly attributed to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Approximately 19-43% of adults with CHD experience symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. In this scenario, addressing anxiety and depression through psychological interventions (PIs) becomes crucial. However, no available syntheses of the efficacy of PIs on anxiety and depression in the population with CHD have been performed thus far. Purpose To explore the efficacy of PIs on anxiety and depression within the CHD population. Methods We have conducted a systematic review up to January 2024 in these databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and EMBASE. The study selection process adhered to specific inclusion criteria: (a) patients of all ages with CHD, (b) randomized controlled trial studies (RCTs), (c) published in English between 2000 and 2023, (d) focusing on PIs targeting anxiety and depression as outcomes. Cohen’s d was calculated to quantify and standardize the effect sizes between groups (treatment group vs. control group, considering an intention-to-treat approach) and within groups (from baseline to the last follow-up) to compute a cumulative effect size (Cohen’s d) per each study that controls potential differences of the outcome scores at the baseline in each study. Random-effect models were applied to pool each primary study's effect size (Stata 18 with the "metan.ado" add-on). Results Out of 558 records identified, only 3 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. These studies, published between 2017 and 2021, predominantly involved adults with CHD. None was conducted in Europe. Three main PIs were tested: Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy, Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction, and Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy. Instead, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory were utilized, while the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was employed to assess both depression and anxiety. For depression (N_intervention group = 93, N_control group = 85), the overall Cohen’s d was -1.04 [95% CI: -2.00, -0.07; p ≤ 0.001] with a moderate level of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 31.53%; Q(2) = 2.79; p = 0.25) as illustrated in Figure 1. Therefore, the findings indicate a moderate statistically significant effect of PIs in reducing depression up to three months post-intervention. Conversely, for anxiety (N_intervention group = 51, N_control group = 43), the overall Cohen’s d was 0 [95% CI: -0.96 +0.97; p ≤ 0.001] as illustrated in Figure 2. Conclusions This study summarizes the current evidence and brings the need for more attention in performing research employing PIs in adults with CHD. In fact, the paucity of available included RCTs sustains the need for more research. The results of this study highlight that PIs appear to be effective in reducing depression, while the studies performed in this population do not support evidence about anxiety.Figure 1.Figure 2.

Effects of positive psychological interventions on positive and negative emotions in depressed individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of positive psychology interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prenatal Emotion Management Improves Obstetric Outcomes: a Randomized Control Study.

Measuring Positive Emotion Outcomes in Positive Psychology Interventions: A Literature Review

Effects of Positive Psychological Interventions on Psychological Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Inflammation Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Effect of Tai Chi Chuan on Negative Emotions in Non-Clinical Populations: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Effects of psychological intervention on negative emotions and psychological resilience in breast cancer patients after radical mastectomy

The Observation of the Effect on Psychosomatic Patients' Negative Emotions by Cognitive Behavior Intervention

The Research of Effect of Strengthened Psychological Interventionon on Negative Emotions of Chronic Disease Patients in Community

Using Social Network Sites to Boost Savoring: Positive Effects on Positive Emotions

Positive psychological interventions for neurological disorders: A systematic review

Efficacy of Expressive Writing Versus Positive Writing in Different Populations: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

The effect of psychosocial interventions on anxiety and depression in congenital heart disease population: a systematic review and explorative meta-analysis

Individual differences in the effects of a positive psychology intervention: Applied psychology

Effects of Visual Art Therapy on Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms, and Emotions in Individuals with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effect of positive mental well-being on patient reported outcome (PRO): finding from a cross-sectional multi-disease study in China

What Emotions to Encourage? The Role of High and Low Arousal Positive Emotions in Three Randomized Controlled Trials of Different Positive Psychology Interventions

Effect of a Positive Psychology Expressive Writing on Stigma, Hope, Coping Style, and Quality of Life in Hospitalized Female Patients with Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of a Positive Psychology Intervention and a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Clinical Depression

Positive psychology interventions in in-patients with depression: influences of comorbidity and subjective evaluation of the training programme

Effects of Traditional Chinese Fitness Exercises on Negative Emotions and Sleep Disorders in College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis