Optimizing Electric Vehicle Integration with Vehicle-to-Grid Technology: The Influence of Price Difference and Battery Costs on Adoption, Profits, and Green Energy Utilization

Jiashun Li,Aixing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031118

IF: 3.9

2024-01-29

Sustainability

Abstract:Over the past decade, the widespread adoption of global green energy has emerged as a predominant trend. However, renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, face significant wastage due to challenges in energy storage. Electric vehicles (EVs) are considered an effective solution to address the energy storage dilemma. "Vehicle-to-grid" (V2G) technology, allowing vehicles to feed electricity into the grid, enhances the efficiency of renewable energy utilization. This paper proposes an electric vehicle game model that comprehensively considers user choices, corporate profits, and green energy utilization. The model, based on difference in prices, electricity rates, and fuel prices, establishes user utility models to determine optimal driving distances and driving decisions. It separately formulates the maximum profit functions for selling conventional electric cars and V2G electric cars, deriving optimal pricing for enterprises and user adoption rates. The research findings indicate that when price difference can offset V2G battery costs, increasing price difference and reducing battery costs effectively enhance electric vehicle adoption rates, increase corporate profits, and improve green energy utilization. Moreover, compared to conventional electric vehicles, V2G electric vehicles demonstrate a comparative advantage, with the implementation of V2G expanding corporate profits and green energy utilization. Validation using Chinese data reveals that when price difference can offset V2G battery costs, drivers are more inclined to choose V2G electric vehicles. Both battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and V2G electric vehicles exhibit adoption rates that can increase by over 35%. This study provides theoretical and model support for the future development of V2G and policy formulation, underscoring the comparative advantages of V2G in enhancing green energy utilization efficiency. Additionally, this study offers valuable insights as a reference for business models in the V2G electric vehicle industry.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the impacts of price differences and battery costs on the adoption rate of electric vehicles (EVs), corporate profits, and the utilization rate of green energy by optimizing the integration of EVs and vehicle - to - grid (V2G) technology. Specifically, the paper proposes an EV game model that comprehensively considers user choices, corporate profits, and the utilization rate of green energy, aiming to provide theoretical support and model basis for future V2G development and policy - making by analyzing how price differences and battery costs affect these aspects.

### Main research questions:
1. **Impacts of price differences and battery costs on the adoption rate of electric vehicles**: Research on the changes in users' willingness to choose to purchase electric vehicles (especially V2G electric vehicles) and the actual adoption rate under different price differences and battery cost conditions.
2. **Optimization of corporate profits**: Analyze the optimal pricing strategies of enterprises when selling traditional electric vehicles and V2G electric vehicles by establishing the maximum profit function to maximize corporate profits.
3. **Improvement of the utilization rate of green energy**: Explore how V2G technology can improve the overall utilization rate of green energy by making better use of renewable energy, thereby promoting sustainable development.

### Research methods:
- **User utility model**: Based on price differences, electricity prices, and fuel prices, establish a user utility model to determine the optimal driving distance and driving decisions.
- **Corporate profit model**: Formulate the maximum profit functions for selling traditional electric vehicles and V2G electric vehicles respectively, and derive the optimal pricing strategies of enterprises and the adoption rate of users.
- **Model calibration**: Use Chinese data to calibrate the model to verify the validity and practicality of the model.

### Research conclusions:
- When price differences can offset V2G battery costs, increasing price differences and reducing battery costs can effectively improve the adoption rate of electric vehicles, increase corporate profits, and improve the utilization rate of green energy.
- Compared with traditional electric vehicles, V2G electric vehicles have a comparative advantage in increasing corporate profits and the utilization rate of green energy.
- Through empirical analysis, it is found that when price differences can offset V2G battery costs, drivers are more inclined to choose V2G electric vehicles, and the adoption rates of BEVs and V2G electric vehicles can both increase by more than 35%.

### Model innovation points:
- **User choice and adoption rate**: Introduce the adoption rate as an intuitive indicator reflecting users' actual preferences to show the changes in user choices after parameter changes.
- **Corporate profitability**: Include electric vehicle manufacturers in the discussion scope, analyze their profitability in V2G business, and make up for the lack of attention to electric vehicle manufacturers in existing research.

### Formula summary:
- **User utility function**:
\[
u(X)=\frac{1}{\omega}(\lambda X - \frac{X^{2}}{2})
\]
where \(X\) represents the driving distance, \(\lambda\) represents the average satisfaction of drivers, and \(\omega\) is a proportional factor for measuring driving utility.

- **Utility of purchasing gasoline - powered vehicles**:
\[
U_{g}=E_{\gamma}[u(\zeta_{g}+\gamma)] - c_{g}\zeta_{g}
\]
where \(\zeta_{g}\) and \(\gamma\) represent the planned and unplanned driving distances respectively, and \(c_{g}\) represents the fuel price per mile.

- **Utility of purchasing electric vehicles**:
\[
U_{ev}=E_{\gamma}[u(\zeta_{ev}+\gamma)] - c_{ev}\zeta_{ev}-F_{ev}+eU_{gr}
\]
where \(c_{ev}\) represents the electricity price per mile, \(F_{ev}\) represents the purchase price of the battery, and \(eU_{gr}\) represents the green utility.

- **V2G utility**:
\[
eU_{v2g}=p_{d}vt - p_{b}vt
\]
where \(p_{d}\) represents the price difference per unit of electricity when participating in V2G, and \(p_{b}\) represents...