Abstract:Intentional forgetting emphasizes the intention and directivity of forgetting. The forgetting of negative events is beneficial to mental and physical health. There are mainly a selective rehearsal theory and a retrieval inhibition theory to explain the intentional forgetting. The selective rehearsal theory claims that the rehearsal of the to-be-remembered items makes its encoding finer than the to-be-forgoten items. As a result, in the recall and recognition task, the grades of to-be-remembered items are higher than the to-be-forgoten ones. The retrieval inhibition theory claims that because of the instruction, the inhibition of the to-be-forgetten items makes their extraction more difficult than the to-be-remembered items. So, in the recall and recognition task, the grades of to-be-remember items are higher than the to-be-forget ones. Some researches have evaluated the different accounts of directed forgetting by comparing outcomes of direct and indirect tests of memory. Direct memory tests, such as free recall and recognition, require intentional recollection and awareness of previously presented materials. In contrast, indirect memory tests, such as word-stem completion, or lexical decision, do not have these requeirements and instead, memory is inferred from a facilitation of task performance in the case of studied items. List-method intentional forgetting and word-method intentional forgetting are two main directed forgetting paradigms. A few studies have examined intentional forgetting in the context of emotion or in the different affective states or with them together. These studies have mainly concerned clinical disorders and coping styles. We designed two experiments to examine how the emotional materials and affective states people experience during encoding and retrieval modulate such intentional forgetting. Two experiments examined differences in recall, word completion and recognition memory for positive, negative, and neutral stimuli and the interaction with affective states. In Experiment 1, words showed on a computer screen one by one, each words following an instruction and, after a distraction task, first to recall as many as the participants could and then to complete the word, finally, to identify previously shown words from a set of old and new ones. We used a 2 (cue type:remember, forget) ×3 (material type: positive, neutral, negative) within-subject design. There were thirty-three participants. The results showed that the free recall accuracy of the to-be-remembered words was higher than that of the to-be-forgotten ones regardless of the types of materials. That is, the positive, neutral and negative words all showed intentional forgetting effects. In Experiment 2, we used a film to evoke the participants into a kind of states, and then to complete the same task as Experiment 1. We used a 2 (cue type:remember, forget) ×3 (material type:positive, neutral, negative) ×2 (affective states:happiness, sadness) mixed-subject design. There were forty participants. The results found that the positive, neutral and negative words all showed intentional forgetting effects. In the positive moods, the participants forgot more negative words;in the negative moods, the participants forgot more neutral words. Together, our findings suggest that intentional forgetting is not only affected by emotional information, but also by mood. Our findings are consistent with the retrieval inhibition theory.

Retrieval-induced forgetting of words with negative emotionality

Effortful retrieval of semantic memories induces forgetting of related negative and neutral episodic memories

Does retrieval-induced forgetting occur for emotional stimuli?

Negative emotion amplifies retrieval practice effect for both task-relevant and task-irrelevant information

Retrieval-induced forgetting with novel visual stimuli is retrieval-specific and strength- independent

Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social task

Retrieval-induced forgetting of emotional memories

Directed Forgetting of Negative Memories and Its Mechanisms

Decreased inhibitory control of negative information in directed forgetting

Retrieval-induced forgetting in undergraduate students is not affected by the correlated costs and benefits problem: evidence from cognitive inhibition

The Impact of Mood-Congruence on Intentional Forgetting

Post-retrieval Distortions of Self-Referential Negative Memory: Valence Consistency Enhances Gist-Directed False, While Non-negative Interference Generates More Intrusive Updates

Individuals with depressive tendencies experience difficulty in forgetting negative material: two mechanisms revealed by ERP data in the directed forgetting paradigm

Negative Emotion Elicited in High School Students Enhances Consolidation of Item Memory, but Not Source Memory

Different Neural Substrates Underlying Directed Forgetting for Negative and Neutral Images: an Event-Related Potential Study.

Repeated retrieval of generalized memories can impair specific autobiographical recall: A retrieval induced forgetting account.

Retrieval-Induced Forgetting and Context

A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Retrieval-induced forgetting, delay, and sleep

Neural correlates underlying impaired memory facilitation and suppression of negative material in depression

Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory.