Abstract:Shoulder arthroplasty has become a standard surgical procedure for treating a variety of complex shoulder disorders, including those with degenerative and traumatic aetiologies. The ever-improving success rates of shoulder arthroplasty could be attributed to advancements in endoprosthesis design, improvements in the biomechanics of endoprosthetic components, and improvements in surgical techniques. It improves patient outcomes and helps restore shoulder joint function and mobility. Imaging plays a vital role by enabling surgeons to plan arthroplasty procedures, help guide endoprosthesis placement, and monitor postoperative outcomes. In addition, imaging plays a role in assessing the residual bone stock and status of rotator cuff integrity and in correcting the placement of prosthetic components to restore shoulder mobility. CT-guided navigation aids surgeons by helping them choose appropriate components for implants and ensuring that implants are placed optimally during surgery. It can lead to better surgical results with reduced patient morbidity and a longer duration of prosthetic stability. After surgery, it is crucial to use imaging techniques to detect issues such as periprosthetic loosening, infections, or fractures to start effective management strategies to enhance patient recovery. This article aims to provide orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists with knowledge on the imaging methods used in shoulder arthroplasty and their role in presurgical planning, intraoperative guidance and postoperative assessment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the rationale behind utilising various types of shoulder replacements: total shoulder replacement (TSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and hemiarthroplasty; methods, their respective advantages and limitations; and outcomes. Our objective is to comprehensively analyse the procedures mentioned above and highlight their unique features and benefits to facilitate a better understanding of these approaches. Additionally, we will discuss how these imaging techniques help identify issues such as loose components, fractures around the implant site, joint instability and infections.

Current Imaging of Anterior and Posterior Instability in the Athlete

Sports-related injuries of the shoulder: instability

The Radiologic Evaluation and Clinical Significance of Glenohumeral Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability

Indication for Computed Tomography Scan in Shoulder Instability: Sensitivity and Specificity of Standard Radiographs to Predict Bone Defects After Traumatic Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Comprehensive Review

[Current Diagnosis and Treatment of Posterior Shoulder Instability].

Biomechanics and Pathoanatomy of Posterior Shoulder Instability

[Current Concepts of Diagnostic Techniques and Measurement Methods for Bone Defect in Patient with Anterior Shoulder Instability].

Evaluating the Athlete with Instability from on the Field to in the Clinic

Management of Shoulder Instability in the Overhead Athletes

Current Concepts in the Measurement of Glenohumeral Bone Loss

Arthroscopic Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability

Patellar Tracking: An Old Problem with New Insights

Risk Factors for Anterior Shoulder Instability: a Matched Case-Control Study

Imaging of traumatic shoulder injuries - Understanding the surgeon's perspective

Imaging characteristics of hip joint microinstability: a case-control study of hip arthroscopy patients

Imaging modalities in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Imaging in shoulder arthroplasty: Current applications and future perspectives

Editorial Commentary: The Gold Standard for Assessment of Hip Instability Is Three-Dimensional (3-D) Imaging.

Accuracy and reliability of imaging modalities for studying bipolar bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review

Diagnosis and treatment of posterior dislocation of the shoulder