Abstract:Summary Previous studies have shown that surgical residents can safely perform a variation of complex abdominal surgeries when provided with adequate training, proper case selection, and appropriate supervision. Their outcomes are equivalent when compared to experienced board-certified surgeons. Our previously published training curriculum for robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy already demonstrated a possible reduction in time to reach proficiency. However, esophagectomy is a technically challenging procedure and comes with high morbidity rates of up to 60%, making it difficult to provide opportunities to train surgical residents. We aimed to investigate if a surgical resident could safely perform complex esophageal surgery when a structured modular teaching curriculum is applied. A structured teaching program based on our previously published modular step-up approach was applied by two experienced board-certified esophageal surgeons. Our IRB-approved (Institutional Review Board) database was searched to identify all Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies performed by the selected surgical resident from August 2019 to July 2021. The cumulative sum method was used to analyze the learning curve of the surgical resident. Outcomes of patients operated by the resident were then compared to our overall cohort of open, hybrid, and robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomies from May 2016 to May 2020. The total cohort included 567 patients, of which 65 were operated by the surgical resident and 502 patients were operated by experienced esophageal cancer surgeons as the control group. For baseline characteristics, a significant difference for BMI (Body mass index) was observed, which was lower in the resident’s group (25.5 kg/m2 vs. 26.8 kg/m2 (P = 0.046). A significant difference of American Society of Anesthesiologists- and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-scores was seen, and a subgroup analysis including all patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 was performed revealing no significant differences. Postoperative complications did not differ between groups. The anastomotic leak rate was 13.8% in the resident’s cohort and 12% in the control cohort (P = 0.660). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) occurred in 16.9% of patients in both groups. Oncological outcome, defined by harvested lymph nodes (35 vs. 32.33, P = 0.096), proportion of lymph node compliant performed operations (86.2% vs. 88.4%, P = 0.590), and R0-resection rate (96.9% vs. 96%, P = 0.766), was not compromised when esophagectomies were performed by the resident. The resident completed the learning curves after 39 cases for the total operating time, 38 cases for the thoracic operating time, 26 cases for the number of harvested lymph nodes, 29 cases for anastomotic leak rate, and finally 58 cases for the comprehensive complication index. For postoperative complications, no significant difference was seen between patients operated in the resident group versus the control group, with a third of patients being discharged with a textbook outcome in both cohorts. Furthermore, no difference in oncological quality of the resection was found, emphasizing safety and feasibility of our training program. A structured modular step-up for training a surgical resident to perform complex esophageal cancer surgery can successfully maintain patient safety and outcomes.

Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis

Operative Experience of Esophageal Surgery among General Surgery Residents in the United States: An Analysis of ACGME Operative Case Logs

Trends of core versus subspecialty operative procedures completed in general surgery residency training programs

The state of affairs: Assessing the scope of endocrine surgery exposure in general surgery residencies across the United States

See One, Do One, Teach One - Trends in Resident Autonomy and Teaching Assistant Cases During General Surgery Residency in the United States: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis

Changing paradigms in minimally invasive surgery training

The impact of a formal minimally invasive service on the resident's ability to achieve new ACGME guidelines for laparoscopy

Trainee Autonomy in Minimally Invasive General Surgery in the United States: Establishing a National Benchmark

Quality Metrics in Surgery Resident Performance of Screening Colonoscopy

A survey of current state of training of plastic surgery residents

Residency Education Practices in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Evaluating Operative Exposure for Medical Students in the Era of Virtual Learning: A Single-Institution Experience

Comparing Graduating Plastic Surgery Residents' Case Logs With Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Requirements, Content at National Meetings, and In-Service Examination Test Items

Trauma resident exposure in Canada and operative numbers (TraumaRECON): a national multicentre retrospective review of operative and nonoperative trauma teaching

"Taking Training to the Next Level": The American College of Surgeons Committee on Residency Training Survey

Practice Readiness? Trends in Chief Resident Case Logs vs Subsequent Case Log Data in Clinical Practice

A senior surgical resident can safely perform complex esophageal cancer surgery after surgical mentoring program—experience of a European high-volume center

Reported Variability in General Surgery Training Across Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs

Bridging the Gap: A Qualitative Assessment of General Surgery Resident Confidence and Knowledge Deficits in Managing Surgical Endocrinopathy

Advanced laparoscopic fellowship and general surgery residency can coexist without detracting from surgical resident operative experience

"Insights into Academic Surgery: A Survey of Trainees and Practicing Surgeons"