Great Lakes mallard population dynamics

Benjamin Z. Luukkonen,Scott R. Winterstein,Daniel B. Hayes,Drew N. Fowler,Gregory J. Soulliere,John M. Coluccy,Amy A. Shipley,John Simpson,Brendan Shirkey,Jason M. Winiarski,Benjamin J. O'Neal,Barbara A. Avers,Gerald R. Urquhart,Philip Lavretsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22702

2024-12-13

Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract:The breeding mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) population in the Great Lakes region (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin) declined by >40% between 2000–2022. We developed an integrated population model to analyze aerial survey and banding data to assess ecological and anthropogenic factors affecting Great Lake mallard population dynamics. Decline in female Great Lakes mallard abundance was associated with increasing non‐hunting mortality and declining productivity. Breeding mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) populations in the Great Lakes region (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, USA) declined by >40% between 2000–2022 based on abundance data collected during spring aerial surveys. Mallards are an important waterfowl species in this region, where an estimated 60–80% of the mallard harvest is composed of locally banded birds. Extensive population monitoring datasets are available for mallards, presenting an opportunity to address complex questions such as estimating productivity at large spatial and temporal scales, identifying the effects of harvest on mallard demography, quantifying mechanisms for harvest compensation, and integrating multiple datasets to quantify the demographic drivers of population change. Our objective was to simultaneously examine factors affecting demographic parameters and their relative contribution to Great Lakes mallard population dynamics. We used 32 years of banding, band recovery, and aerial survey data collected for mallards from Michigan and Wisconsin to develop an integrated population model (IPM). We used age ratios at banding to estimate productivity, band recoveries from hunter‐harvested birds to estimate annual survival and cause‐specific mortality (i.e., harvest or non‐hunting), and modeled abundance using aerial survey and demographic parameter estimates from 1991–2022. The IPM results indicated the decline in Great Lakes mallard abundance was caused by increased non‐hunting mortality and a decline in productivity. Productivity varied spatially but temporally declined with the loss of Conservation Reserve Program area. Moreover, our productivity assessment provided evidence of density dependence in reproduction. Non‐hunting mortality was 3.5–6.7 times and 1.3–4.2 times greater than harvest mortality for adult and juvenile female mallards, respectively, indicating environmental factors during spring and summer, not harvest, most greatly influenced annual mortality for female mallards. Our IPM reduced uncertainty in the factors affecting Great Lakes mallard population dynamics and indicated management actions that address non‐hunting mortality and productivity would be most effective in increasing Great Lakes mallard abundance.

ecology,zoology