Pleural infection presentation and timeline of events: Real-world data from a tertiary hospital in the UK

Mannan,S.,Waseem,T.,Safwan,N.,Ganaie,M.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5118
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Background: Pleural infection remains a significant burden on mortality and morbidity in the Western world even with the advancement of clinical management. Objectives: This paper aims to study the clinical course of empyema thoracic patients managed in a tertiary hospital in the UK. Method: We did a retrospective observational study of the hospital's electronic records of patients who were diagnosed and managed for empyema thoracic from January 2021 to December 2022. Results: The total cohort was 104 empyema thoracic patients. The mean age was 60. The affected males were almost double than females (68 vs 36). We did a retrospective RAPID score of our cohort. The RAPID score could not be calculated for 35 patients due to the unavailability of pleural fluid data. High inpatient mortality (23%) was observed in the medium-risk (RAPID score 3-4) group and high 3-month mortality (25%) was observed in the high-risk (RAPID score 5-7) group. The majority of the patients were managed conservatively. No difference was noticed in the median length of hospital stay (11d) in all the risk groups. A high rate of (37%) surgical management was observed in the low-risk (RAPID score 0-2) group. VariablesLow-risk groupMedium risk groupHigh-risk groupNo RAPID scoreNumber of patients3530435Median LOS11111111Conservative Management22(62%)20(67%)4(100%)24(69%)Surgical management13(37%)10(33%)011(31%)Inpatient mortality2(6%)7(23%)04(11%)90-day mortality01(3%)1(25%)2(6%) Conclusion: Our cohort's data comply with the predicted mortality risk of the RAPID score. We emphasize that RAPID score calculation can be a significant tool in the management of empyema thoracic patients.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?