Unpacking the Myth in the Associations Between Self-control and Gaming Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A Comparison Between Traditional and Random Intercept Cross-lagged Panel Model Analyses

Di QI,Xiaomin LI,Shimin ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01294-0
IF: 8
2024-04-09
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Abstract:Internet gaming is becoming increasingly popular; however, children and adolescents are highly vulnerable to gaming disorder due to the underdevelopment of cognitive control. Longitudinal research providing empirical evidence confirming the stability and direction of the association between self-control and gaming disorder is scarce. This study is aimed at clarifying whether prospective relationships exist between self-control and gaming disorder in children and adolescents or whether they are associated due to common causes. We examined the temporal dynamics of the associations between self-control and gaming disorder symptom severity using a traditional cross-lagged panel model (CLPM; aggregating between- and within-person variance) and a random intercept CLPM (RI-CLPM; disaggregating between- and within-person effects) with three-annual wave data from a large cohort of primary and secondary students ( N = 1359, mean age 12.67 ( SD 1.40), 834 (61.7%) girls). The traditional CLPM indicated a unidirectional negative relationship from self-control to later gaming disorder ( B with 95% confidence interval [CI] = − 0.12 [− 0.19, − 0.040]), whereas the RI-CLPM analysis revealed no prospective relationship between self-control and gaming disorder (95% CIs of B s all contain 0), indicating that self-control was neither the cause nor the result of gaming disorder in children and adolescents. Our study revealed that the nature of the relationship between self-control and gaming disorder tends to be correlational but not causal. The potential common underlying factors for future research are discussed.
psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to clarify whether there is a prospective relationship between self - control and gaming disorder in children and adolescents, or whether they are related due to common causes. Specifically, the study aims to explore the temporal dynamics of the association between self - control and the severity of gaming disorder symptoms, and verify the nature of these relationships through traditional cross - lagged panel model (CLPM) and random - intercept cross - lagged panel model (RI - CLPM) analyses to determine whether self - control is the cause or the result of gaming disorder, or whether there is a bidirectional relationship between them. ### Research Background - **Popularity of Internet Games**: In recent years, online games have become more and more popular, but children and adolescents are more likely to develop gaming disorder due to the incomplete development of cognitive control ability. - **Definition of Gaming Disorder**: According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM - 5) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD - 11), gaming disorder is defined as a pattern of behavior of losing control over games and continuing to over - play, even though this will lead to significant functional impairment and negative consequences. - **Importance of Self - Control**: An individual's self - control ability is considered crucial in avoiding negative outcomes (such as problematic gaming use), and insufficient self - control ability increases the risk of developing gaming disorder. ### Research Purposes - **Clarify the Relationship**: The study aims to clarify whether the relationship between self - control and gaming disorder is unidirectional, bidirectional, or just a correlative relationship. - **Method Comparison**: Through traditional CLPM and RI - CLPM analyses, separate the between - group effects and the within - group effects to more accurately estimate the potential causal relationship between self - control and gaming disorder. ### Main Findings - **Results of Traditional CLPM**: The traditional CLPM analysis shows that there is a unidirectional negative relationship between self - control and subsequent gaming disorder (the B - value and its 95% confidence interval are - 0.12 [- 0.19, - 0.040]). - **Results of RI - CLPM**: The RI - CLPM analysis shows that there is no prospective relationship between self - control and gaming disorder, indicating that self - control is neither the cause nor the result of gaming disorder. ### Conclusions - **Nature of the Relationship**: The study shows that the relationship between self - control and gaming disorder tends to be correlative rather than causal. - **Methodological Significance**: The study emphasizes the importance of separating between - group effects and within - group effects when estimating the connection between self - control and gaming disorder. The RI - CLPM analysis can more accurately reveal how individual - internal changes affect the severity of gaming disorder, thus providing a basis for designing more effective intervention measures. ### Practical Applications - **Prevention and Intervention**: The research results are of great significance for developing prevention and intervention strategies for gaming disorder in children and adolescents, especially by enhancing self - control resources to prevent gaming disorder in adolescents and/or the decline of self - control ability, thereby avoiding further adverse developmental consequences.