Abstract:It remains a pressing concern to understand how neural computations relate to risky decisions. However, most observations of brain-behavior relationships in the risk-taking domain lack a rigorous computational basis or fail to emulate of the dynamic, sequential nature of real-life risky decision making. Recent advances emphasize the role of neural prediction error (PE) signals. We modelled, according to prospect theory, the choices of n = 43 human participants (33 females, ten males) performing an EEG version of the hot Columbia Card Task, featuring rounds of sequential decisions between stopping (safe option) and continuing with increasing odds of a high loss (risky option). Single-trial regression EEG analyses yielded a subjective value signal at centroparietal (300-700 ms) and frontocentral (>800ms) electrodes and in the delta band, as well as PE signals tied to the feedback-related negativity, P3a, and P3b, and in the theta band. Higher risk preference (total number of risky choices) was linked to attenuated subjective value signals but increased PE signals. Higher P3-like activity associated with the most positive PE in each round predicted stopping in the present round but not risk taking in the subsequent round. Our findings indicate that decreased representation of decision values and increased sensitivity to winning despite low odds (positive PE) facilitate risky choices at the subject level . Strong neural responses when gains are least expected (the most positive PE on each round) adaptively contribute to safer choices at the trial-by-trial level but do not affect risky choice at the round-by-round level . Significance statement It remains an open question, most pressingly in mental health, how neural computations facilitate real-life risky behavior (e.g. drinking, criminal activities). This endeavor requires a rigorous computational basis as well as paradigms emulating the dynamic, sequential nature of real-life risk taking. We applied prospect theory to model sequentially dependent risky choices and isolated neural correlates of subjective decision values and unexpected gains (prediction errors). This allowed us to show that overall risk-taking was related to hyperactive prediction error and reduced decision value signals. Moreover, subjects responded more cautiously following higher neural responses to the least expected gains. These findings indicate multi-layered, independent roles of prediction error processing, mediating safer choices at the trial-level but risk tendencies at the subject-level.

Efficient value synthesis in the orbitofrontal cortex explains how loss aversion adapts to the ranges of gain and loss prospects

The Neural Dynamics of Loss Aversion

A neural mechanism for conserved value computations integrating information and rewards

The Neural Dynamics of Reward Value and Risk Coding in the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Activation of the DLPFC Reveals an Asymmetric Effect in Risky Decision Making: Evidence from a Tdcs Study

Risk-taking is associated with decreased subjective value signals and increased prediction error signals in the hot Columbia Card Task

Rational inattention in neural coding for economic choice

Asymmetric Valuation and Belief Updating over Gain and Loss in Risky Decision Making: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Investigation.

Striatal GABA levels correlate with risk sensitivity in monetary loss

What Are the Odds? the Neural Correlates of Active Choice During Gambling

Emotion-induced loss aversion and striatal-amygdala coupling in low-anxious individuals

Adaptation of reward sensitivity in orbitofrontal neurons

Evaluating choices by single neurons in the frontal lobe: outcome value encoded across multiple decision variables

Temporally organized representations of reward and risk in the human brain

How cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic subnetworks can shift decision policies to maximize reward rate

Neural dynamics in the orbitofrontal cortex reveal cognitive strategies

The rat frontal orienting field dynamically encodes value for economic decisions under risk

Overlapping and Distinct Neural Systems Code for Subjective Value during Intertemporal and Risky Decision Making

Activity of Prefrontal Neurons Predict Future Choices during Gambling

Winning versus losing during gambling and its neural correlates

Rapid Changes in Risk Preferences Originate from Bayesian Inference on Parietal Magnitude Representations