Abstract:Abstract Background The family of TGF- β ligands is large and its members are involved in many different signaling processes. These signaling processes strongly differ in type with TGF- β ligands eliciting both sustained or transient responses. Members of the TGF- β family can also act as morphogen and cellular responses would then be expected to provide a direct read-out of the extracellular ligand concentration. A number of different models have been proposed to reconcile these different behaviours. We were interested to define the set of minimal modifications that are required to change the type of signal processing in the TGF- β signaling network. Results To define the key aspects for signaling plasticity we focused on the core of the TGF- β signaling network. With the help of a parameter screen we identified ranges of kinetic parameters and protein concentrations that give rise to transient, sustained, or oscillatory responses to constant stimuli, as well as those parameter ranges that enable a proportional response to time-varying ligand concentrations (as expected in the read-out of morphogens). A combination of a strong negative feedback and fast shuttling to the nucleus biases signaling to a transient rather than a sustained response, while oscillations were obtained if ligand binding to the receptor is weak and the turn-over of the I-Smad is fast. A proportional read-out required inefficient receptor activation in addition to a low affinity of receptor-ligand binding. We find that targeted modification of single parameters suffices to alter the response type. The intensity of a constant signal (i.e. the ligand concentration), on the other hand, affected only the strength but not the type of the response. Conclusions The architecture of the TGF- β pathway enables the observed signaling plasticity. The observed range of signaling outputs to TGF- β ligand in different cell types and under different conditions can be explained with differences in cellular protein concentrations and with changes in effective rate constants due to cross-talk with other signaling pathways. It will be interesting to uncover the exact cellular differences as well as the details of the cross-talks in future work.

Encoding of Temporal Signals by the TGF-β Pathway and Implications for Embryonic Patterning

An adhesion code ensures robust pattern formation during tissue morphogenesis

Signal processing in the TGF-beta superfamily ligand-receptor network

Dynamics of BMP signaling and stable gene expression in the early Drosophila embryo

Cell‐specific responses to the cytokine TGF β are determined by variability in protein levels

The plasticity of TGF-βsignaling

The plasticity of TGF-beta signaling

Influence of TGF-βand Its Receptor on Embryo Implantation

TGFβ Family Signaling and Development

Pathway crosstalk enables cells to interpret TGF-β duration

Controlling TGF-β Signaling

Illuminating morphogen and patterning dynamics with optogenetic control of morphogen production

Endogenous Patterns of TGFbeta Superfamily Signaling During Early Xenopus Development.

TGF-β Signaling from Receptors to Smads

Optimal control of gene regulatory networks for morphogen-driven tissue patterning

Self-organized pattern formation in the developing mouse neural tube by a temporal relay of BMP signaling

Dynamics of positional information in the vertebrate neural tube

Temporal Gradients Controlling Embryonic Cell Cycle

Contextual determinants of TGFβ action in development, immunity and cancer

Mouse embryo geometry drives formation of robust signaling gradients through receptor localization

TGF-β family ligands exhibit distinct signalling dynamics that are driven by receptor localisation