Soil compaction reversed the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil hydraulic properties

Püschel David,Rydlová Jana,Sudová Radka,Jansa Jan,Bitterlich Michael

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-024-01153-9

2024-05-30

Mycorrhiza

Abstract:Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) typically provide a wide range of nutritional benefits to their host plants, and their role in plant water uptake, although still controversial, is often cited as one of the hallmarks of this symbiosis. Less attention has been dedicated to other effects relating to water dynamics that the presence of AMF in soils may have. Evidence that AMF can affect soil hydraulic properties is only beginning to emerge. In one of our recent experiments with dwarf tomato plants, we serendipitously found that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus ( Rhizophagus irregularis 'PH5') can slightly but significantly reduce water holding capacity (WHC) of the substrate (a sand–zeolite–soil mixture). This was further investigated in a subsequent experiment, but there we found exactly the opposite effect as mycorrhizal substrate retained more water than did the non-mycorrhizal substrate. Because the same substrate was used and other conditions were mostly comparable in the two experiments, we explain the contrasting results by different substrate compaction, most likely caused by different pot shapes. It seems that in compacted substrates, AMF may have no effect upon or even decrease the substrates' WHC. On the other hand, the AMF hyphae interweaving the pores of less compacted substrates may increase the capillary movement of water throughout such substrates and cause slightly more water to remain in the pores after the free water has drained. We believe that this phenomenon is worthy of mycorrhizologists' attention and merits further investigation as to the role of AMF in soil hydraulic properties.

mycology,plant sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily discusses the impact of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on soil moisture characteristics, particularly the Water Holding Capacity (WHC). In the study, the authors observed opposing phenomena regarding the effect of AMF on soil water holding capacity through two experiments:

1. **Experiment A** (Exp-A) showed that AMF slightly but significantly reduced the substrate's water holding capacity.

2. **Experiment B** (Exp-B), on the other hand, observed an increase in the substrate's water holding capacity due to AMF.

Both experiments used the same plant species (dwarf tomato), the same AMF strain (Rhizophagus irregularis 'PH5'), and the same substrate composition (a mixture of sand, zeolite, and soil), with the only difference being the shape of the experimental containers. Experiment A used a plastic basin that was narrower at the bottom and wider at the top, while Experiment B used containers made of straight-walled PVC pipes.

The authors proposed a reason to explain this phenomenon, suggesting that the difference is due to the varying degrees of substrate compaction caused by the different shapes of the experimental containers. In Experiment A, the shape of the container led to the substrate being gradually squeezed into a narrower space as the saturation cycle progressed, resulting in greater compaction, which affected the development of AMF and possibly reduced the size distribution of the substrate's pores, thereby affecting gas diffusion. This could have led to a reduced contribution of AMF to soil structure formation, thus lowering the substrate's water holding capacity. In Experiment B, however, the straight-walled container resulted in less compaction of the substrate, allowing for more robust development of the AMF network, which could have promoted the formation of soil structure and increased the substrate's water holding capacity.

In summary, the paper aims to explore how AMF affects soil moisture characteristics, especially in terms of soil water holding capacity, and attempts to explain why different experimental setups with the same type of AMF and substrate conditions can produce completely opposite results.