Abstract:Abstract Background Breast cancer mortality is principally due to tumor recurrence, which can occur following extended periods of clinical remission that may last decades. While clinical latency has been postulated to reflect the ability of residual tumor cells to persist in a dormant state, this hypothesis remains unproven since little is known about the biology of these cells. Consequently, defining the properties of residual tumor cells is an essential goal with important clinical implications for preventing recurrence and improving cancer outcomes. Methods To identify conserved features of residual tumor cells, we modeled minimal residual disease using inducible transgenic mouse models for HER2/neu and Wnt1-driven tumorigenesis that recapitulate cardinal features of human breast cancer progression, as well as human breast cancer cell xenografts subjected to targeted therapy. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to isolate tumor cells from primary tumors, residual lesions following oncogene blockade, and recurrent tumors to analyze gene expression signatures and evaluate tumor-initiating cell properties. Results We demonstrate that residual tumor cells surviving oncogenic pathway inhibition at both local and distant sites exist in a state of cellular dormancy, despite adequate vascularization and the absence of adaptive immunity, and retain the ability to re-enter the cell cycle and give rise to recurrent tumors after extended latency periods. Compared to primary or recurrent tumor cells, dormant residual tumor cells possess unique features that are conserved across mouse models for human breast cancer driven by different oncogenes, and express a gene signature that is strongly associated with recurrence-free survival in breast cancer patients and similar to that of tumor cells in which dormancy is induced by the microenvironment. Although residual tumor cells in both the HER2/neu and Wnt1 models are enriched for phenotypic features associated with tumor-initiating cells, limiting dilution experiments revealed that residual tumor cells are not enriched for cells capable of giving rise to primary tumors, but are enriched for cells capable of giving rise to recurrent tumors, suggesting that tumor-initiating populations underlying primary tumorigenesis may be distinct from those that give rise to recurrence following therapy. Conclusions Residual cancer cells surviving targeted therapy reside in a well-vascularized, desmoplastic microenvironment at both local and distant sites. These cells exist in a state of cellular dormancy that bears little resemblance to primary or recurrent tumor cells, but shares similarities with cells in which dormancy is induced by microenvironmental cues. Our observations suggest that dormancy may be a conserved response to targeted therapy independent of the oncogenic pathway inhibited or properties of the primary tumor, that the mechanisms underlying dormancy at local and distant sites may be related, and that the dormant state represents a potential therapeutic target for preventing cancer recurrence.

Unveiling cancer dormancy: Intrinsic mechanisms and extrinsic forces

Mechanisms of disseminated cancer cell dormancy: an awakening field

The current paradigm and challenges ahead for the dormancy of disseminated tumor cells

Advances in the molecular regulation mechanism of tumor dormancy and its therapeutic strategy

Dormancy and cancer stem cells: An enigma for cancer therapeutic targeting

Progression of tumor dormancy models

Outlook and opportunities for engineered environments of breast cancer dormancy

Tumor dormancy as an alternative step in the development of chemoresistance and metastasis - clinical implications

Targeting cancer cell dormancy

The role of cancer cell bioenergetics in dormancy and drug resistance

Unveiling the role of cellular dormancy in cancer progression and recurrence

The dormant cancer cell life cycle

Dormancy, stemness, and therapy resistance: interconnected players in cancer evolution

Cellular dormancy in minimal residual disease following targeted therapy

Tumor removal limits prostate cancer cell dissemination in bone and osteoblasts induce cancer cell dormancy through focal adhesion kinase

Dormancy-inducing 3D-engineered matrix uncovers mechanosensitive and drug protective FHL2-p21 signaling axis

A Cellular Automaton Model for Tumor Dormancy: Emergence of a Proliferative Switch

Dormancy and awakening of cancer cells: the extracellular vesicle-mediated cross-talk between Dr. Jekill and Mr. Hyde

TGF-beta Family Signaling Pathways in Cellular Dormancy

From ecology to oncology: To understand cancer stem cell dormancy, ask a Brine shrimp (<i>Artemia</i>)

Breast Cancer Dormancy is Associated with a 4NG1 State and Not Senescence