Ca2+-induced Ca2+ Release in Sensory Neurons
Kunfu Ouyang,Caihong Wu,Heping Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.c500026200
IF: 5.485
2005-01-01
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Abstract:Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) is a ubiquitous mechanism by which Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum amplifies the trigger Ca2+ entry and generates propagating Ca2+ waves. To elucidate the mechanisms that control this positive feedback, we investigated the spatial and temporal kinetics and measured the gain function of CICR in small sensory neurons from mammalian dorsal root ganglions (DRGs). We found that subsurface Ca2+ release units (CRUs) are under tight local control by Ca2+ entry, whereas medullar CRUs as a "common pool" system are recruited by inwardly propagating CICR. Active CRUs often displayed repetitive Ca2+ sparks, conferring the ability to encode a "memory" of neuronal activity well beyond the duration of an action potential. Store Ca2+ reserve was able to support all CRUs each to fire ∼15 sparks, excluding use-dependent inactivation or store depletion as the major CICR termination mechanism. Importantly, CICR in DRG neurons operated in a low gain, linear regime (gain = 0.54), which conferred intrinsic stability to CICR. Combined with high Ca2+ current density (–156 pA/pF at –10 mV), such a low gain CICR system generated large intracellular Ca2+ transients without jeopardizing the stability. These findings provide the first demonstration that CICR operating in a low gain regime can be harnessed to provide a robust and graded amplification of Ca2+ signal in the absence of counteracting inhibitory mechanism. Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) is a ubiquitous mechanism by which Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum amplifies the trigger Ca2+ entry and generates propagating Ca2+ waves. To elucidate the mechanisms that control this positive feedback, we investigated the spatial and temporal kinetics and measured the gain function of CICR in small sensory neurons from mammalian dorsal root ganglions (DRGs). We found that subsurface Ca2+ release units (CRUs) are under tight local control by Ca2+ entry, whereas medullar CRUs as a "common pool" system are recruited by inwardly propagating CICR. Active CRUs often displayed repetitive Ca2+ sparks, conferring the ability to encode a "memory" of neuronal activity well beyond the duration of an action potential. Store Ca2+ reserve was able to support all CRUs each to fire ∼15 sparks, excluding use-dependent inactivation or store depletion as the major CICR termination mechanism. Importantly, CICR in DRG neurons operated in a low gain, linear regime (gain = 0.54), which conferred intrinsic stability to CICR. Combined with high Ca2+ current density (–156 pA/pF at –10 mV), such a low gain CICR system generated large intracellular Ca2+ transients without jeopardizing the stability. These findings provide the first demonstration that CICR operating in a low gain regime can be harnessed to provide a robust and graded amplification of Ca2+ signal in the absence of counteracting inhibitory mechanism. Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) 1The abbreviations used are: CICR, Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; F, farad or fluorescence; RyR, ryanodine receptor; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; CRU, Ca2+ release unit. (1Endo M. Tanaka M. Ogawa Y. Nature. 1970; 228: 34-36Crossref PubMed Scopus (575) Google Scholar, 2Ford L.E. Podolsky R.J. Science. 1970; 167: 58-59Crossref PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar) is a ubiquitous mechanism whereby Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER, or sarcoplasmic reticulum in muscles) is triggered by and amplifies an elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration. A positive feedback in nature, CICR ensures the needed sensitivity, speed, and magnitude of Ca2+ signals in diverse physiological processes, ranging from cell contraction to secretion and to neurotransmitter release (3Clapham D.E. Cell. 1995; 80: 259-268Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2268) Google Scholar, 4Berridge M.J. Neuron. 1998; 21: 13-26Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1755) Google Scholar, 5Neher E. Neuron. 1998; 20: 389-399Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (855) Google Scholar, 6Bers D.M. Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force. 2nd Ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2001Crossref Google Scholar). Spatially regenerative CICR, in the form of propagating Ca2+ waves, is also capable of broadcasting an otherwise local signal over the entire cytoplasm as well as nucleoplasm, such as those observed during fertilization (7Gilkey J.C. Jaffe L.F. Ridgway E.B. Reynolds G.T. J. Cell Biol. 1978; 76: 448-466Crossref PubMed Scopus (393) Google Scholar). Understanding the control mechanisms of CICR is thus fundamental to understanding the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ signaling. In its simplest form, uncontrolled CICR with high gain amplification is expected to behave in an all-or-none fashion. Yet, CICR in various biological systems is often finely tuned to the magnitude and duration of the trigger Ca2+ signal, mainly Ca2+ influx via Ca2+ currents (ICa). In an exemplary system found in mammalian ventricular myocytes, CICR serves to amplify the trigger ICa at a gain of 10–70, depending on membrane voltage (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar). Studies for more than a decade have established that cardiac CICR system comprises a discrete, rather than continuum, architecture, with ryanodine receptor (RyR) Ca2+ release channels assembled into discrete Ca2+ release units (CRUs) (11Franzini-Armstrong C. Protasi F. Ramesh V. Biophys. J. 1999; 77: 1528-1539Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (491) Google Scholar); individual CRUs operate in a digital, rather than analogous, mode, generating "Ca2+ sparks" as the elementary events of CICR (12Cheng H. Lederer W.J. Cannell M.B. Science. 1993; 262: 740-744Crossref PubMed Scopus (1619) Google Scholar, 13Cannell M.B. Cheng H. Lederer W.J. Science. 1995; 268: 1045-1049Crossref PubMed Scopus (513) Google Scholar, 14Lopez-Lopez J.R. Shacklock P.S. Balke C.W. Wier W.G. Science. 1995; 268: 1042-1045Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar, 15Wang S.Q. Wei C.L. Zhao G.L. Brochet D. Shen J.X. Song L.S. Wang W. Yang D.M. Cheng H. Circ. Res. 2004; 94: 1011-1022Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar). During cardiac excitation-contraction coupling, spark genesis is under tight control of local Ca2+ influx, which is essential to achieving high gain amplification and stability simultaneously (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 13Cannell M.B. Cheng H. Lederer W.J. Science. 1995; 268: 1045-1049Crossref PubMed Scopus (513) Google Scholar, 16Stern M.D. Biophys. J. 1992; 63: 497-517Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (531) Google Scholar, 17Niggli E. Lederer W.J. Science. 1990; 250: 565-568Crossref PubMed Scopus (141) Google Scholar, 18Wang S.Q. Song L.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. Nature. 2001; 410: 592-596Crossref PubMed Scopus (338) Google Scholar). Emerging evidence from intensive recent research indicates that terminating CICR in the heart involves substantial ER Ca2+ store depletion (19Trafford A.W. Diaz M.E. Sibbring G.C. Eisner D.A. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 2000; 522: 259-270Crossref Scopus (152) Google Scholar, 20Szentesi P. Pignier C. Egger M. Kranias E.G. Niggli E. Circ. Res. 2004; 95: 807-813Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar, 21Gyorke I. Gyorke S. Biophys. J. 1998; 75: 2801-2810Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (331) Google Scholar, 22Brochet D.X.P. Yang D. Di Maio A. Lederer W.J. Franzini-Armstrong C. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102: 3099-3104Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar) and strong use-dependent inactivation (18Wang S.Q. Song L.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. Nature. 2001; 410: 592-596Crossref PubMed Scopus (338) Google Scholar, 23Sham J.S. Song L.S. Deng L.H. Chen-Izu Y. Lakatta E.G. Stern M.D. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 15096-15101Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar) or some other inhibitory mechanism (24Gyorke S. Fill M. Science. 1993; 260: 807-809Crossref PubMed Scopus (274) Google Scholar, 25Valdivia H.H. Kaplan J.H. Ellis-Davies G.C. Lederer W.J. Science. 1995; 267: 1997-2000Crossref PubMed Scopus (317) Google Scholar). Recently, we have demonstrated that Ca2+ sparks from type 3 RyR (RyR3) constitute the elementary events of CICR in small sensory neurons from rat dorsal root ganglions (DRGs). 2K. Ouyang, H. Zheng, X. Qin, C. Zhang, D. Yang, X. Wang, C. Wu, Z. Zhou, and H. Cheng, submitted for publication. DRG Ca2+ sparks, particularly those localized to surface membrane, play an important role in the regulation of vesicular secretion from the somata of these cells.2 In the present study, we used DRG neurons as a model system to investigate possible control mechanisms of CICR. We demonstrated that CICR in DRG neurons operates in the low gain, linear amplification regime in conjunction with high ICa density, which confers intrinsic stability and large Ca2+ transient amplitude in the absence of counteracting termination mechanisms. Our results were compared and contrasted with those from heart muscle cells, a well characterized model system of CICR. Cell Preparation—Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were rendered unconscious by exposure to CO2 and decapitated. The DRGs (C5-L5) were harvested and treated with collagenase (1.5 mg ml–1) and tripsin (1 mg ml–1) at 37 °C, as described.2 Cells were used 2–10 h after preparation. Only the small (15–25 μm, C-type) neurons without apparent processes were used. Electrophysiology—Single cell patch clamp recordings were performed using an EPC-7 amplifier and pClamp 6.0 software (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht/Pfalz, Germany), as described previously.2 Under whole-cell voltage clamp conditions, membrane voltage was held at –70 mV with the patch pipette resistance of 2–4 MΩ. Test pulses from –55 mV to +50 mV of variable durations (400–2000 ms) were applied every 20 s. Standard external solution contained (in mm): NaCl 150, KCl 5.0, CaCl2 2.0, MgCl2 1.0, HEPES 10, and glucose 10 (pH 7.4 adjusted with NaOH). An EGTA-free pipette solution contained (in mm): CsCl 150, MgATP 5.0, Li4GTP 0.1, and HEPES 10 (pH 7.2 adjusted with CsOH); and a high EGTA solution contained (in mm): CsCl 150, MgATP 5.0, Li4GTP 0.1, EGTA 10, CaCl2 3.0 (free Ca2+ concentration ∼100 nm), and HEPES 10 (pH 7.2 adjusted with CsOH). The Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4 pentapotassium salt (0.15 mm) was directly dissolved in the pipette solution. Amplitude of Ca2+ currents was measured at 20 ms into depolarization, after the Na+ current spike. The amount of Ca2+ influx (Q) was calculated as integral of Ca2+ current. For perforated patch clamp recording of action potentials, intracellular pipette solution contained (in mm): 150 KCl, 5.0 NaCl, 4.0 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.15 nystatin (pH = 7.2). Under current clamp conditions, action potentials were elicited by injecting a 3-ms depolarizing current. Ca2+ indicators were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), and all other chemicals were from Sigma. All experiments were performed at room temperature (22–25 °C). Confocal Ca2+Imaging—DRG neurons were loaded with the Ca2+ indicator, Fluo-4, either via dialysis through the patch pipette in the broken-in whole-cell patch clamp configuration or incubation with the acetoxymethyl ester form of the indicator (5–10 μm, 20–30 min) in the perforated patch clamp experiments. Indicator-stained DRG neurons were imaged at 488 nm excitation and >510 nm emission with a Zeiss 510 inverted confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss), in the line scan or curve scan mode. The horizontal and axial resolutions were 0.4 and 1.5 μm, respectively, achieved with 40× oil immersion lens (NA 1.3), and the line scan rate was 3.07 ms per scan. In some experiments, 5 mm caffeine was added to nominal zero Ca2+ solution and delivered to cells by locally placed glass pipette. Acquisition of confocal Ca2+ imaging was usually synchronized to electrophysiological commands in whole-cell voltage or current clamp experiments. Image processing and data analysis were performed using custom-devised algorithms coded in Interactive Data Language (Research Systems, Inc., Boulder, CO). Measurement of the Gain of CICR—The gain of CICR was defined as the ratio between the amount of released Ca2+ for the ER and the trigger Ca2+ influx via ICa. The ICa and the subsurface Ca2+ transient were directly measured with whole-cell voltage clamping and confocal curve scan imaging, respectively. A linear relationship between Ca2+ transient and Ca2+ flux via ICa (QICa) alone was first established in cells which CICR was abrogated by ryanodine pretreatment (10 μm, 20 min) (see Fig. 3C). The total Ca2+ flux (Qtotal) from both release and influx in cells with intact ER function was then determined from this calibration curve, and the release component was determined by subtracting QICa from its corresponding Qtotal. Immunolabeling—To visualize RyR3 localization, dissociated DRG neurons were fixed and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary monoclonal antibodies that recognize both RyR1 (not expressed in this type of cells; see Ref. 27Lokuta A.J. Komai H. McDowell T.S. Valdivia H.H. FEBS Lett. 2002; 511: 90-96Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar) and RyR3 (28Yang D.M. Pan Z. Ma J. Cheng H. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 40210-40214Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar). Cells were then incubated with Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) for 1 h in the dark. Immunofluorescence was detected by the Zeiss confocal microscope with 543 nm excitation, >560 nm emission, and 1.0 μm axial resolution. Confocal Z-stack imaging was performed at Z intervals of 0.5 μm. Zeiss LSM software (Carl Zeiss) was used for three-dimensional reconstruction and animation. Statistics—Data were given as mean ± S.E. The significance of difference between means was determined, when appropriate, using Student's t test and paired t test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Organization and Operation of Subsurface CRUs—Fig. 1A shows typical immunofluorescent staining of RyR3 in a small sensory neuron (diameter = 15–25 μm) from rat DRGs, illustrating that intensely stained spots were enriched along a ring right beneath the surface membrane. The bulk cytoplasm was diffusively stained at a reduced intensity, and the nucleus was devoid of any specific immunofluorescence. The average distance between adjacent RyR3 spots was measured to be 1.84 ± 0.10 μm(n = 113), and about 400 subsurface RyR3 spots could be identified in a typical cell. These results are in good agreement with our previous report.2 To determine whether these RyR3 spots are indeed functional CRUs, we employed the so-called Ca2+ spike measurement (9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar) combined with the "curve scan" imaging technique (Fig. 1B). Specifically, the fast Ca2+ indicator, Fluo-4, along with a slow Ca2+ chelator (EGTA, 10 mm), was dialyzed into the cell through the patch pipette under whole-cell voltage clamp conditions. Because of kinetic disparity between Fluo-4 and EGTA, a fraction of released Ca2+ ions will first bind to the indicator (of fast kinetics) before being captured by the nonfluorescent EGTA at excess. As a result, this experimental setting allows for pinpointing the spatial localization and tracking the time course of Ca2+ release fluxes (9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar). While holding the membrane potential at –70 mV, rapid local application of 5 mm caffeine, which sensitizes CICR, elicited transient Ca2+ releases from discrete sites. These functional release sites were, on average, separated 1.7 μm apart, similar to those between adjacent RyR3 spots (Fig. 1A). Thus, the Ca2+ spike measurement strongly suggests that RyR3 spots visualized in Fig. 1A represent CRUs in DRG neurons. Measurement of Store Ca2+Capacity—Local Ca2+ release functions at five representative sites are shown to the bottom of Fig. 1C. During the onset of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ release, discrete Ca2+ spikes, which reflect solitary Ca2+ sparks, were clearly discernible. However, at increasing rate of occurrence, they were quickly fused into an apparently continuous release pattern. Nearly all DRG CRUs underwent repetitive activation, indicating a large store Ca2+ reserve. To quantify the capacity of store Ca2+ reserve, we divided the total signal mass of the release function (space-time integral of ΔF/F0) with the average signal mass for individual spikes (8.3 ± 1.1 ΔF/F0·ms·μm, n = 68) (see supplemental Fig. s1A). We found that, on average, each CRU discharges about 15 Ca2+ spikes or sparks in a caffeine-elicited Ca2+ release (Fig. s1B). Since excessive EGTA should have largely "clamped" the cytosolic free Ca2+ level and thereby minimized the replenishment of the ER during an ongoing release (9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 23Sham J.S. Song L.S. Deng L.H. Chen-Izu Y. Lakatta E.G. Stern M.D. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 15096-15101Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar), this result suggests that the caffeine-liable Ca2+ store does not undergo substantial depletion in individual sparks. Action Potential Evoked Non-inactivating Ca2+Spark Activity—To examine the ability of neural action potentials, typically of millisecond duration, to evoke Ca2+ sparks, cells were loaded with Fluo-4 via incubation with the acetoxymethyl ester form of the indicator and were then subjected to perforated patch clamping in conjunction with confocal curve scan imaging. In response to brief action potentials (APD50 = 4.4 ± 0.1 ms, n = 10), subsurface Ca2+ rose sharply to 1.16 ± 0.13 (ΔF/F0 unit) within 21.0 ± 2.5 ms and then declined with a half-decay time of 165 ± 31 ms. The rise time of Ca2+ transients outlasted APD50 but was similar to those of Ca2+ sparks,2 consistent with a synchronous activation of sparks that evolve autonomously. Moreover, trains of Ca2+ sparks were discernible in the wake of the action potential-induced Ca2+ transient, lingering for more than 2000 ms. This is in sharp contrast to the use-dependent inactivation and refractoriness in heart muscle cells (18Wang S.Q. Song L.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. Nature. 2001; 410: 592-596Crossref PubMed Scopus (338) Google Scholar, 23Sham J.S. Song L.S. Deng L.H. Chen-Izu Y. Lakatta E.G. Stern M.D. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 15096-15101Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). We conclude that subsurface Ca2+ sparks serve to decode membrane excitation into cytosolic Ca2+ signal and retain a "memory" of membrane activity well beyond the duration of an action potential. Recruitment of Medullar CRUs—The immunostaining in Fig. 1A suggests that medullar CRUs stand free of contact with the surface Ca2+ channels, forming a common pool system. To determine whether medullar CRUs participate in excitaion-Ca2+ release coupling in DRG neurons, and, if so, to investigate the mechanism responsible for the recruitment of medullar CRUs, we examined subsurface and medullar Ca2+ transients in response to trigger ICa under whole-cell voltage clamp conditions. At near-threshold voltages (–55 mV), Ca2+ release was exclusively restricted to discrete subsurface sites, each displaying repetitive spark activity (Fig. 2A, right). When medullar Ca2+ was elevated due to Ca2+ diffusion from the subsurface, medullar Ca2+ sparks became evident at intermediate voltages (–45 mV, Fig. 2B). During full-fledged excitation-Ca2+ release coupling at –10 mV, coordinated radial CICR took the form of inwardly propagating, unmitigated Ca2+ waves, rendering the crescent wavefront seen in the linescan image (Fig. 2C). Similar inward propagation of Ca2+ signals upon excitation has been seen previously in sympathetic ganglion cells (29Hua S.Y. Liu C. Lu F.M. Nohmi M. Kuba K. Cell Calcium. 2000; 27: 195-204Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). After ryanodine pretreatment (10 μm, 20 min), inhibition of CICR halved amplitudes of local Ca2+ transients (ΔF/F0 3.89 ± 0.29 in control; 2.72 ± 0.21 in CICR-deficient cells, n = 11, p < 0.01) and prolonged the delay time (at 5 μm from the surface) by 70% (161 ± 10 in control; 275 ± 38 ms in CICR-deficient cells, n = 11, p < 0.01), without an effect on ICa density (–156 ± 24 in control; –151 ± 23 pA/pF in CICR-deficient cells, n = 11, p > 0.05). The amplitude ratio of subsurface and medullar (5 μm into the cytosol) Ca2+ transients was also decreased from 0.96 ± 0.05 to 0.76 ± 0.03 (n = 11) in the absence of CICR. Hence, while subsurface CRUs directly amplify the trigger Ca2+ entry, medullar CRUs relay subsurface Ca2+ signals and ensure a speedy and uniform broadcast of the signal over the entire cytoplasm. Gain of CICR in DRG Neurons—We reckoned that, by examining subsurface Ca2+ transient arising from a known ICa, the so-determined relationship between the Ca2+ transient amplitude and QICa could then be used to calibrate the release flux. In cells where CICR was abrogated by ryanodine pretreatment (10 μm, 20 min), ICa and the ensuing subsurface Ca2+ transient were directly measured with whole-cell voltage clamping and confocal curve-scan imaging, respectively. Two interesting results came from this experiment. First, DRG neurons displayed a very high ICa density, with the peak of –156 ± 24 pA/pF at –10 mV (n = 11) (Fig. 3B). This value is at least an order of magnitude higher than those in heart muscle cells (∼–10 pA/pF at –10 mV) (6Bers D.M. Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force. 2nd Ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2001Crossref Google Scholar, 8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar). Moreover, the subsurface Ca2+ transient amplitude (ΔF/F0) was linearly correlated with QICa over wide ranges of ΔF/F0 (0.21–3.44) and QICa (0.07–0.97 × 10–9 Coulomb) (r2 = 0.85, Fig. 3C). In cells with the ER function intact, we measured the ICa and the subsurface Ca2+ transient arising from both Ca2+ entry and release. As summarized in Fig. 3, A and B, subsurface Ca2+ transient amplitude exhibited a bell-shaped voltage dependence, mirroring the voltage-ICa relationship. This finding corroborates the notion that CICR is smoothly graded to the trigger Ca2+ entry. To quantify the release component, we first calculated the total Ca2+ flux, Qtotal, based on the calibration curve in Fig. 3C, and then the release flux by subtracting from it the ICa component, i.e. Qtotal – QICa. From this, the gain of CICR was then defined as the ratio between the release and ICa components. Surprisingly, the average value of the gain of CICR in DRG cells was merely 0.54 (n = 35 cells). This value is not only far below those in cardiac cells (10–70 depending on voltage) (6Bers D.M. Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force. 2nd Ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2001Crossref Google Scholar, 8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar) but also considerably smaller than unity, a criterion for intrinsic stability of CICR (16Stern M.D. Biophys. J. 1992; 63: 497-517Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (531) Google Scholar). Furthermore, the gain function was virtually constant over test voltages ranging from –30 mV to +50 mV, independently of either whole-cell ICa density or single-channel current amplitude (iCa). This is also in stark contrast to cardiac CICR, which gain function monotonically declines from ∼70 to about ∼10 between –40 and +40 mV (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar). Uncontrolled CICR, when operating in the regime of amplification gain >1.0, is expected to be intrinsically unstable, unless it is under tight local control (16Stern M.D. Biophys. J. 1992; 63: 497-517Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (531) Google Scholar). Even with local control, a stable, high gain CICR, such as that in heart muscle cells, still necessitates counter mechanisms that negate the positive feedback to terminate the release (30Stern M.D. Cheng H. Cell Calcium. 2004; 35: 591-601Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar). To this end, the present study has uncovered several important features on the control of CICR in a mammalian sensory neuron, which are summarized in Table I along with cardiac CICR as the reference system. First, neural CICR comprises a hybrid architecture; the subsurface CRUs are under tight local control by Ca2+ influx, whereas the medullar CICR is more appropriately categorized as a common-pool system (in which all RyRs sense a more-or-less uniform level of global Ca2+). In addition to regulating membrane-delimited Ca2+-dependent events (e.g. somatic secretion),2 subsurface CICR also amplifies the trigger Ca2+ for the recruitment of medullar CRUs. The medullar CICR, on the other hand, appears to be indispensable for a speedy and unmitigated relay of Ca2+ signal over the entire cell (Fig. 2). Second, virtually all CRUs manifest repetitive spark activity, indicative of lacking inactivation and refractoriness (Figs. 1, C and D, and 2, A and B). Although unexpected, this is consistent with the report that RyR3 from DRGs displays no Ca2+-depndent inactivation in planar lipid bilayer even at 10 mm Ca2+ on the cytosolic side (27Lokuta A.J. Komai H. McDowell T.S. Valdivia H.H. FEBS Lett. 2002; 511: 90-96Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar). The large store Ca2+ reserve capacity (Fig. 1) further excludes store depletion as a major determinant for the termination of CICR. At the same time, we found that DRG Ca2+ transient amplitude is smoothly graded by the trigger ICa (Fig. 3, A and B), indicating the stability of CICR.Table IProperties of neural and cardiac CICRPropertiesDRG sensory neuronsVentricular myocytesMolecular playersCICR mediated by RyR3CICR mediated by RyR2Trigger signalICa at high density (-156 pA/pF at -10 mV)ICa (∼-10 pA/pF at -10 mV) (6Bers D.M. Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force. 2nd Ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2001Crossref Google Scholar,8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar)Elemental eventsCa2+ sparks from discrete CRUsCa2+ sparks from discrete CRUs (12Cheng H. Lederer W.J. Cannell M.B. Science. 1993; 262: 740-744Crossref PubMed Scopus (1619) Google Scholar, 13Cannell M.B. Cheng H. Lederer W.J. Science. 1995; 268: 1045-1049Crossref PubMed Scopus (513) Google Scholar, 14Lopez-Lopez J.R. Shacklock P.S. Balke C.W. Wier W.G. Science. 1995; 268: 1042-1045Crossref PubMed Scopus (422) Google Scholar)Architecture of controlA hybrid architecture: subsurface CRUs under local control and medullar CRUs forming a common pool systemSubsurface and medullar CRUs are both under local control because of the highly specialized transverse tubular system (10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar,11Franzini-Armstrong C. Protasi F. Ramesh V. Biophys. J. 1999; 77: 1528-1539Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (491) Google Scholar,15Wang S.Q. Wei C.L. Zhao G.L. Brochet D. Shen J.X. Song L.S. Wang W. Yang D.M. Cheng H. Circ. Res. 2004; 94: 1011-1022Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar)Peak Ca2+ levelBell-shaped voltage dependenceBell-shaped voltage dependence (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar)ΔF/Fo ∼ 3-4 (Fluo-4 signal) at -10 mVΔF/Fo3-4 at ∼-10 mVInactivationNo apparent inactivationStrong use-dependent inactivation (18Wang S.Q. Song L.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. Nature. 2001; 410: 592-596Crossref PubMed Scopus (338) Google Scholar, 23Sham J.S. Song L.S. Deng L.H. Chen-Izu Y. Lakatta E.G. Stern M.D. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998; 95: 15096-15101Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar)Capacity of store Ca2+ reserveCa2+ store can support all CRUs to fire ∼ 15 roundsSubstantial local store depletions during sparks (22Brochet D.X.P. Yang D. Di Maio A. Lederer W.J. Franzini-Armstrong C. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102: 3099-3104Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar) or global Ca2+ transients (22Brochet D.X.P. Yang D. Di Maio A. Lederer W.J. Franzini-Armstrong C. Cheng H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005; 102: 3099-3104Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar, 26Shannon T.R. Guo T. Bers D.M. Circ. Res. 2003; 93: 40-45Crossref PubMed Scopus (175) Google Scholar)LinearityLinear function of the trigger Ca2+Nonlinear power function of the trigger Ca2+ (power = 2) (31Santana L.F. Cheng H. Gomez A.M. Cannell M.B. Lederer W.J. Circ. Res. 1996; 78: 166-171Crossref PubMed Scopus (215) Google Scholar)GainLow gain regime (gain = 0.54)High gain regime (gain ∼10-70)Voltage-independentMonotonic decreasing function of voltage (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar)StabilityUnconditionally stableStable under normal Ca2+ loadUnable to support spontaneous Ca2+ wavesInstability manifested as spontaneous Ca2+ waves under "Ca2+ overload" conditions (6Bers D.M. Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force. 2nd Ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands2001Crossref Google Scholar) Open table in a new tab The central issue is then what mechanism confers the stability to CICR in the absence of counteracting termination mechanisms? Quantitative measurement of the gain function indicates that CICR in DRG neurons is a linear, low gain amplification system, whose gain value is always smaller than unity (Fig. 3D). According to the theory put forward by Stern (16Stern M.D. Biophys. J. 1992; 63: 497-517Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (531) Google Scholar), such a low gain CICR system is endowed with intrinsic stability, i.e. CICR is self-limiting in the absence of additional termination mechanisms other than spontaneous closure of the release channel. The intrinsic stability of CICR is also consistent with our preliminary observation that CICR in DRG neurons appears to be unconditionally stable; it is unable to support spontaneous propagating Ca2+ waves even when the cells were challenged with high extracellular Ca2+ (10 mm, data not shown). It is noteworthy that, despite the low gain amplification, neural Ca2+ transient magnitude is not compromised, because DRG cells are equipped with a compensating high ICa density (Table I). Taken together, the present study provides the first demonstration that CICR operating in a low gain regime can be harnessed to provide a robust and graded amplification of Ca2+ signal in the absence of counteracting termination mechanism. Another interesting finding is that the CICR gain function in DRG neurons is voltage-independent (Fig. 3D), rendering neural CICR a linear amplification mechanism. By contrast, the gain of cardiac CICR is a monotonic decreasing function of voltage (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar, 9Song L.S. Sham J.S. Lakatta E.G. Cheng H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1998; 512: 677-691Crossref Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Wier W.G. Balke C.W. Circ. Res. 1999; 85: 770-776Crossref PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar). The cardiac result was initially taken as a signature feature in favor of the local control model of CICR (8Wier W.G. Egan T.M. Lopez-Lopez J.R. Balke C.W. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1994; 474: 463-471Crossref Scopus (222) Google Scholar), because the gain is not uniquely determined by whole-cell ICa but also by microscopic properties of single-channel iCa. Later it has been shown to reflect the fact that RyR activation is a nonlinear, power function of iCa with the power of 2 (31Santana L.F. Cheng H. Gomez A.M. Cannell M.B. Lederer W.J. Circ. Res. 1996; 78: 166-171Crossref PubMed Scopus (215) Google Scholar). Intuitively, the linear amplification in DRG neurons may further ensure the stability of neural CICR. The present results indicate that CRUs retain a memory of membrane excitation, in the form of hyperactive sparks, well beyond the duration of an action potential. One possible explanation is that Ca2+ influx via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels results in overfilling of subsurface Ca2+ stores above normal, which, in turn, promotes elevated spontaneous spark activity (memory). However, direct measurement of store Ca2+ capacity demonstrated that this is not the case, because we failed to detect any significant change in store Ca2+ capacity prior to and 1 s after the action potential (see supplemental Fig. s2). Alternatively, the hyperactive sparks might be activated due to the elevation of background cytosolic Ca2+. This hypothesis is not tenable, either, because hyperactive sparks are restricted to only a number of CRUs, while all CRUs are amid the elevated cytosolic Ca2+. Moreover, hyperactive sparking sites are observed during small depolarization (Fig. 2, A and B), when little elevation of cytosolic or ER Ca2+ is expected. Hence we propose that the memory-encoding hyperactive Ca2+ sparks reflect an intrinsic property of CRU operation. For instance, a CRU at an excited state may undergo many open-close transitions before returning to its basal state. Using DRG sensory neurons as a model system, we have uncovered mechanisms fundamental to the control of CICR, which are distinctly different from what we have thus far learned from muscle cells. Among others, CICR in DRG neurons is characterized by the hybrid local control and common pool architecture, the apparent lack of counteracting termination mechanisms, and the low gain, linear amplification combined with the high density Ca2+ entry. In this way, the neural CICR mechanism is capable of generating large intracellular Ca2+ transients without jeopardizing stability. The striking differences as well as similarities between neural and cardiac CICR (Table I) are instructive as to how the same signaling mechanism can be adaptive and plastic in different biological systems. Since similar hybrid architecture is common to many types of cells, including sympathetic ganglion neurons (29Hua S.Y. Liu C. Lu F.M. Nohmi M. Kuba K. Cell Calcium. 2000; 27: 195-204Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar), neurons of the central nervous system (4Berridge M.J. Neuron. 1998; 21: 13-26Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1755) Google Scholar), and smooth muscle myocytes (32Nelson M.T. Cheng H. Rubart M. Santana L.F. Bonev A.D. Knot H.J. Lederer W.J. Science. 1995; 270: 633-637Crossref PubMed Scopus (1204) Google Scholar), the insights gleaned from DRG neurons may prove to be valuable in understanding Ca2+ regulation and signaling in diverse physiological contexts. We thank Drs. Rui-ping Xiao, Jie Liu, and Dongmei Yang for thoughtful reading of the manuscript. Download .pdf (.12 MB) Help with pdf files