Prenatal cell-free DNA testing of women with pregnancy-associated cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional study
Catharina J Heesterbeek,Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen,Joosje H Heimovaara,Liesbeth Lenaerts,Christianne Lok,Ingeborg J H Vriens,Diane Van Opstal,Elles M J Boon,Daoud Sie,Christine E M de Die-Smulders,Frédéric Amant,Merryn V E Macville,Dutch NIPT Consortium,E A Sistermans,L Henneman,A Polstra,E Voorhoeve,S L Zelderen-Bohla,E M J Boon,M P R Lombardi,C Louwerens-Zintel,M Smit,M C van Maarle,M B Tan-Sindhunata,K van der Meij,H Meij,C Bax,E Pajkrt,I H Linskens,L Martin,J T Gitsels-van der Wal,R J H Galjaard,D Van Opstal,M I Srebniak,F M Sarquis Jehee,I H I M Hollink,F Sleutels,W de Valk,W H Deelen,A M S Joosten,K E M Diderich,M E Redeker,A T J I Go,M F C M Knapen,S Galjaard,A K E Prinsen,A P G Braat,M V E Macville,S J C Stevens,A van der Wijngaard,L H Houben,M A A van Esch-Lennarts,L Hamers,A G P Jetten,S A I Ghesquiere,B de Koning,M ZamaniEsteki,C J Heesterbeek,C E M de Die-Smulders,H Brunner,M J Pieters,A B C Coumans,D F C M Smeets,B H W Faas,D Westra,M M Weiss,I Derks-Prinsen,I Feenstra,M van Rij,E Sikkel,M J V Hoffer,N S den Hollander,E J T Verweij,M C Haak,R F Suijkerbuijk,B Sikkema-Raddatz,I M van Langen,K Bouman,L K Duin,G H Schuring-Blom,K D Lichtenbelt,M N Bekker,A J E M van der Ven,E van Vliet-Lachotzki,J Pot,S van 't Padje,I M C Bakker,E J Bradley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101024
2024-08-07
Abstract:Background: Incidentally, the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) shows chromosomal aberrations suspicious of a maternal malignancy, especially after genome-wide testing. The aim of this study is to determine how many cases of cancer in pregnancy are diagnosed or missed with NIPT and whether in retrospect subtle changes in NIPT results could have detected cancer. Methods: We identified Dutch patients diagnosed in 2017-2021 with pregnancy-associated cancer from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) Registry, who underwent NIPT in the Dutch NIPT implementation study (TRIDENT-2). We retrospectively assessed how many of these women showed a malignancy suspicious-NIPT, their tumour types and -stages, and the time interval between NIPT and cancer diagnosis. Findings: Of 143 women with pregnancy-associated cancer, we included 65 patients that underwent an NIPT. Fifty-four women had a solid tumour and 11 a haematological malignancy. Sixteen (24.6%) NIPTs were malignancy suspicious (15 genome-wide, one targeted). All 10 haematological cancer patients with genome-wide NIPT had a malignancy suspicious-NIPT, irrespective of the disease stage. Only five patients with a solid tumour had a genome-wide malignancy suspicious-NIPT (4/5 advanced cancer stage III or IV). The mean time between date of NIPT and cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter after a malignancy suspicious-NIPT compared to a non-suspicious-NIPT, respectively 49.9 days (± SD 31.8) and 100.7 days (± SD 74.9), p = 0.001. Interpretation: All genome-wide NIPT in women with pregnancy-associated haematological malignancies were malignancy suspicious. Women with a solid tumour showed a malignancy suspicious-NIPT in only a minority of cases, mainly the advanced stages. Funding: None.