Is wedge resection equivalent to segmentectomy in pathological stage IA (≤2 cm) non‐small cell lung cancers?

Zhirong Zhang,Feng Li,Shuo Chen,Bin Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15377
IF: 3.223
2024-05-30
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:In the matched cohort, patients who underwent segmentectomy continued to demonstrate better outcomes with a 5‐year overall survival (OS) of 87.75% compared to 84.05% in patients undergoing wedge resection (p = 0.0096). Nevertheless, no statistically significant difference in the 5‐year lung cancer‐specific survival (LCSS) rate was still observed between the two groups (93.45% vs. 93.73%, p = 0.84). Both wedge resection and segmentectomy offer comparable oncological outcomes for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer ≤ 2 cm. Background Sublobar resection (wedge resection and segmentectomy) has been established as an oncologically equivalent option to lobectomy for early‐stage patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤ 2 cm. However, the optimal approach of sublobar resection remains subject to debate. In the present study we aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of wedge resection and segmentectomy in these patients. Methods We identified patients with pT1a‐bN0M0 NSCLC who underwent wedge resection and segmentectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2020. A Cox regression model and propensity‐score matching (PSM) analysis were used. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer‐specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results A total of 4190 patients met our selection criteria, including wedge resection in 3137 and segmentectomy in 1053. Patients undergoing wedge resection were less likely to have total lymph nodes resected (4 vs. 7, p
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?