Abstract:Objective: The handover of vehicle control from automated to manual operation is a critical aspect of interaction between drivers and automated driving systems (ADS). In some cases, it is possible that the ADS may fail to detect an object. In this event, the driver must be aware of the situation and resume control of the vehicle without assistance from the system. Consequently, the driver must fulfill the following 2 main roles while driving: (1) monitor the vehicle trajectory and surrounding traffic environment and (2) actively take over vehicle control if the driver identifies a potential issue along the trajectory. An effective human-machine interface (HMI) is required that enables the driver to fulfill these roles. This article proposes an HMI that constantly indicates the future position of the vehicle. Methods: This research used the Toyota Dynamic Driving Simulator to evaluate the effect of the proposed HMI and compares the proposed HMI with an HMI that notifies the driver when the vehicle trajectory changes. A total of 48 test subjects were divided into 2 groups of 24: One group used the HMI that constantly indicated the future position of the vehicle and the other group used the HMI that provided information when the vehicle trajectory changed. The following instructions were given to the test subjects: (1) to not hold the steering wheel and to allow the vehicle to drive itself, (2) to constantly monitor the surrounding traffic environment because the functions of the ADS are limited, and (3) to take over driving if necessary. The driving simulator experiments were composed of an initial 10-min acclimatization period and a 10-min evaluation period. Approximately 10 min after the start of the evaluation period, a scenario occurred in which the ADS failed to detect an object on the vehicle trajectory, potentially resulting in a collision if the driver did not actively take over control and manually avoid the object. Results: The collision avoidance rate of the HMI that constantly indicated the future position of the vehicle was higher than that of the HMI that notified the driver of trajectory changes, χ2 = 6.38, P < .05. The steering wheel hands-on and steering override timings were also faster with the proposed HMI (t test; P < .05). Conclusions: This research confirmed that constantly indicating the position of the vehicle several seconds in the future facilitates active driver intervention when an ADS is in operation.

Analysis of driver behavior for joint human-machine systems design of intelligent driving system

Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers’ Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System

Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation

Driver Behavior Modeling Using Game Engine and Real Vehicle: A Learning-Based Approach

Driving Process' Analysis and HUD Design Based on Conditional Autonomous Traffic Safety.

An instrumented vehicle test bed and analysis methodology for investigating driver behavior

Automatic Dangerous Driving Intensity Analysis for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems from Multimodal Driving Signals

Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study

Influence of Pedestrian Collision Warning Systems on Driver Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study

Realization and Evaluation of an Instructor-Like Assistance System for Collision Avoidance

Analysis of Driver Response Based on Natural Sensors and Driving Dataset

Assessing safety critical driving patterns of heavy passenger vehicle drivers using instrumented vehicle data - An unsupervised approach

A Human-Machine Shared Control Framework Considering Time-Varying Driver Characteristics

A Driver-Automation Shared Control for Forward Collision Avoidance While Automation Failure

A dynamic driving-style analysis method based on drivers' interaction with surrounding vehicles

Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving

Shared Control Driver Assistance System Based on Driving Intention and Situation Assessment

The Classification of Short and Long-term Driving Behavior for an Advanced Driver Assistance System by Analyzing Bidirectional Driving Features

Determination of ADAS AEB Car to Car and Car to Pedestrian Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles

Human-Based Risk Model for Improved Driver Support in Interactive Driving Scenarios

Event-Triggered Personalized Driving Based on Passenger’s Subjective Risk Evaluation