Selecting Building Façade Materials by Integrating Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment into Value Engineering

Abdullah N. Naseer,Khalid S. Al-Gahtani,Ayman A. Altuwaim,Naif M. Alsanabani,Abdulmohsen S. Almohsen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114611

IF: 3.9

2024-05-30

Sustainability

Abstract:Building façades represent one of the most critical elements affecting a city's quality of life, and they impact the country's economic income by attracting visitors. However, performance data on façades are limited or incomplete, making it challenging for designers to evaluate their effectiveness in energy efficiency, thermal performance, durability, and other key performance metrics. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for evaluating and prioritizing material selection criteria in building cladding, establishing the relationship with available alternatives, and integrating decision-making processes with Building Information Modeling (BIM) to automate the Value Engineering (VE) concept. The material selection criteria from the literature and international standard manual were identified, and their criteria weight was then evaluated using SWARA (stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis). Additionally, WASPAS (weighted aggregated sum product assessment) was utilized to evaluate the alternative cladding materials based on the defined criteria and their associated quality weight (QW). The life cycle cost (LCC) of the alternatives was computed. The VE was computed and then ranked based on the QW and LCC of the alternatives. The procedure was connected to the BIM model to automate the assessment, specifying the necessary parameters and the BIM computation. A case study of an office building façade was conducted to validate the proposed framework. In this study, the significant criteria were durability, wind load resistance, and thermal insulation. This approach enables executives to evaluate cladding selection, ensuring efficient decision-making processes. The proposed method and its results were subjected to expert testing, and the satisfaction rate exceeded 80%, confirming the framework's reliability in evaluating alternatives. This paper enhances the understanding of material selection methodologies and provides a valuable contribution to the field of construction management.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper mainly discusses the issue of material selection for building facades. Currently, designers face challenges in evaluating key performance indicators such as energy efficiency, thermal performance, and durability due to limited or incomplete facade data. The study proposes an integrated framework that combines the Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods in Value Engineering (VE) to automate the evaluation process and integrate it with Building Information Modeling (BIM). The framework aims to evaluate and prioritize criteria for building material selection, considering the relationships of available alternatives, and automate the VE concept in BIM.

The research first identifies material selection criteria in literature and international standard manuals and determines their weights using SWARA. Then, alternative facade materials are evaluated using WASPAS based on the defined criteria and Quality Weights (QW). The life cycle costs (LCC) of alternatives are calculated, and VE is computed and ranked based on QW and LCC. This process is connected with the BIM model to automate the evaluation and assign parameters.

Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in office building facade material selection, with expert satisfaction testing exceeding 80% and validating the reliability of the framework. The paper emphasizes the understanding of material selection methodology and provides valuable contributions to the field of construction management. The goal is to support wise decisions for building facade materials by considering quality, cost, and stakeholder preferences.