Abstract:Numerous theoretical frameworks have been developed to explain the gap between the possession of environmental knowledge and environmental awareness, and displaying pro-environmental behavior. Although many hundreds of studies have been undertaken, no definitive explanation has yet been found. Our article describes a few of the most influential and commonly used analytical frameworks: early US linear progression models; altruism, empathy and prosocial behavior models; and finally, sociological models. All of the models we discuss (and many of the ones we do not such as economic models, psychological models that look at behavior in general, social marketing models and that have become known as deliberative and inclusionary processes or procedures (DIPS)) have some validity in certain circumstances. This indicates that the question of what shapes pro-environmental behavior is such a complex one that it cannot be visualized through one single framework or diagram. We then analyze the factors that have been found to have some influence, positive or negative, on pro-environmental behavior such as demographic factors, external factors (e.g. institutional, economic, social and cultural) and internal factors (e.g. motivation, pro-environmental knowledge, awareness, values, attitudes, emotion, locus of control, responsibilities and priorities). Although we point out that developing a model that tries to incorporate all factors might neither be feasible nor useful, we feel that it can help illuminate this complex field. Accordingly, we propose our own model based on the work of Fliegenschnee and Schelakovsky (1998) who were influenced by Fietkau and Kessel (1981).

Offsetting behavioral costs with personal attitude: Identifying the psychological essence of an environmental attitude measure

How do we know we are measuring environmental attitude? Specific objectivity as the formal validation criterion for measures of latent attributes

Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents

Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations

The dominance of introspective measures and what this implies: The example of environmental attitude

Environmental Attitude in the 28 Member States of the European Union: Cross-Cultural Comparisons Grounded in Incommensurable Measurement Instruments

Values, Beliefs, Attitudes: An Empirical Study on the Structure of Environmental Concern and Recycling Participation

Distinguishing between Low- and High-Cost Pro-Environmental Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Two Complementary Studies

Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?

A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour

A behavioural measure of environmental decision-making for social surveys

Attitudes towards technology and their relationship with pro-environmental behaviour: Development and validation of the GATT scale

The behavioral response to a corporate carbon offset program: A field experiment on adverse effects and mitigation strategies

(Mis)matched direct and moderating relationships among pro-environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and pro-environmental behaviors across and within 11 countries

Behavioral barriers impede pro-environmental decision-making: Experimental evidence from incentivized laboratory and vignette studies

Mapping Motivation Cost in Physical Education: Validating a Psychometric Instrument

Going Green (and Not Being Just More Pro-Social): Do Attitude and Personality Specifically Influence Pro-Environmental Behavior?

Understanding Environmental Attitude and Willingness to Pay With an Objective Measure of Attitude Strength

Conceptual and methodological considerations to the negative footprint illusion: a reply to Gorissen et al. (2024)

Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach