Relationship between heart rate variability and echocardiography indices of cardiac function in healthy individuals

Mushidur Rahman,Sophie L. Russell,Nduka C. Okwose,Charles J. Steward,Helen Maddock,Prithwish Banerjee,Djordje G. Jakovljevic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12910
2024-11-07
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Abstract:Purpose This study evaluated the relationship between HRV and echocardiography indices of cardiac function. Methods Healthy individuals (N = 30) aged 33 ± 10 years old, underwent short‐term resting HRV assessment and transthoracic echocardiography with speckle tracking analysis. Time domain ‐ (i.e. R‐R interval, root mean square of successive RR interval difference (RMSSD), standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and frequency domain‐measures of HRV (i.e. high‐frequency power (HF), low‐frequency power (LF), high‐frequency normalised (HFnorm) and low‐frequency normalised (LFnorm)). Echocardiography indices of cardiac function included; Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left‐ and right‐ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV‐GLS, and RV GLS), left atrial strain: left atrial reservoir (LAres), left atrial conduit (LAcon) and left atrial contraction (LACT). Results The mean values for HRV time‐domain measures were: R‐R (991 ± 176 ms), SDNN (50.9 ± 21.5 ms), and RMSSD (46.8 ± 29.4 ms); and frequency‐domain: LF (727 ± 606 ms2), HF (415 ± 35 ms2), LFnorm (56 ± 19.4) and HFnorm (36.5 ± 18.8). Mean values for indices of cardiac function were LVEF (59.9% ± 2.8%), LV‐GLS (19.2% ± 1.4%), RV‐GLS (21.7% ± 2.7%), LAres (36.8% ± 6.99%), LAcon (26.2% ± 6.95%) and LACT (12.3% ± 3.56%). There was a significant negative relationship between HF and LV‐GLS (r = −0.47, p = 0.01) and RMSSD and LVEF (r = −0.39, p = 0.03) respectively. Conclusion Heart rate variability measures such as high frequency power and RMSSD are associated with left ventricle systolic function in healthy individuals.
physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?