Abstract:At the remote UNESCO Word Heritage Site Te Wāhipounamu, we show that eDNA analysis is a highly sensitive tool with strong potential for biodiversity surveys, which is still limited by the unavailability of local reference data. We hope that by demonstrating the extend of divergence between eDNA and more traditional tools in a real‐life case study of a remote region of high conservation interest, we further strengthen the case to fund the establishment of local eDNA reference data, also to benefit Te Wāhipounamu. Effective management of biodiversity requires regular surveillance of multiple species. Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) by metabarcoding holds promise to achieve this relatively easily. However, taxonomy‐focused eDNA surveys need suitable molecular reference data, which are often lacking, particularly at the species level and for remote locations. To evaluate the comparability of environmental DNA surveys and traditional surveys in a real‐life case study in a marine area of high conservation value, we conducted a biodiversity survey of the fish in remote and pristine Te Wāhipounamu/Fiordland (Aotearoa/New Zealand), incorporating multiple data sources. We compared eDNA‐derived species identifications against Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) data collected at the same time and locations as eDNA. We also cross‐referenced both eDNA and BRUV data against literature and the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS), with literature and OBIS data representing a summary of multiple traditional surveying approaches. In total, we found 116 fish species in our study area. Environmental DNA detected 43 species; however, only three of those species overlap with species known from the literature, OBIS, or our BRUV analyses. A total of 61 fish species were known from the region from the literature, while OBIS listed 28 species, and our BRUV analyses picked up 26 species. BRUV data coincided more strongly than eDNA data with literature and OBIS data. Twenty of the 26 species detected by BRUV were known from literature and OBIS. We argue that limitated DNA reference databases are the main cause of this discrepancy, and our results indicate that eDNA of rare and endangered species can be detected if matching reference data were available. Environmental DNA analyses can only identify species present among reference data and with relaxed taxonomic assignment parameters may converge on relatives of detected species if the actually existing species themselves are missing among reference data. However, the high number of species detected by our eDNA analyses confirms that eDNA could be a powerful tool for biodiversity surveys if suitable investments in local reference databases were made.

Monitoring the threatened Harttiella (Siluriformes, Loricariidae) with environmental DNA: A comparison between metabarcoding and targeted digital PCR

Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high‐diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes

Monitoring mosquito richness in an understudied area: can environmental DNA metabarcoding be a complementary approach to adult trapping?

Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water

A comparative analysis of eDNA metabarcoding and field surveys: Exploring freshwater plant communities in rivers

Comparison of markers for the monitoring of freshwater benthic biodiversity through DNA metabarcoding

Getting rid of 'rain' and 'stars': Mitigating inhibition effects on ddPCR data analysis, the case study of the invasive crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in the streams of Luxembourg

Optimizing detectability of the endangered fan mussel using eDNA and ddPCR

Comparison of qPCR and metabarcoding for environmental DNA surveillance of a freshwater parasite

Monitoring the ecological status of rivers with diatom eDNA metabarcoding: A comparison of taxonomic markers and analytical approaches for the inference of a molecular diatom index

Benchmarking three DNA metabarcoding technologies for efficient detection of non-native cerambycid beetles in trapping collections

Navigating diversity: primer impact on arthropod recovery in molecular environmental monitoring in tropical Amazon

eDNA-based survey of the marine vertebrate biodiversity off the west coast of Guadeloupe (French West Indies)

Genomic resources for the monitoring and management of Tometes trilobatus, Hoplias aimara and Myloplus rhomboidalis, three exploited freshwater fish species in French Guiana

Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring

Comparison of traditional and molecular surveys of fish biodiversity in southern Te Wāhipounamu/Fiordland (Aotearoa/New Zealand)

Evaluating sediment and water sampling methods for the estimation of deep-sea biodiversity using environmental DNA

Validation of an eDNA-based method for surveying fish and crustacean communities in the rivers of the French West Indies

Multi-method survey rediscovers critically endangered species and strengthens Madagascar's freshwater fish conservation

Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities