Abstract:<h2 class="section-title u-h3 u-margin-l-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Summary</h2><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background & Aims</h3><p>Image-assisted or image-based dietary assessments (IBDAs) refer to the use of food images as the primary dietary record and have emerged as key methods for evaluating habitual dietary intake; however, the validity of image-assisted or IBDAs is still unclear, and no meta-analysis has been conducted. Our aim was to investigate the validity of IBDAs in assessing energy intake (EI) and macronutrients compared to biomarker-based (double-labeled water (DLW)) and traditional methods of 24-h dietary recall (24-HDR) and estimated/weighed food records (WFRs).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Of the 4346 papers identified, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 606 participants.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The overall weighted mean difference (WMD) in EI showed significant under-reporting (WMD=-179.32 kcal, 95% confidence interval (CI): -269.50 to -89.15 kcal; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>=89%), with the greatest difference observed between tests and DLW (WMD=-448.04 kcal, 95% CI: -755.52 to -140.56 kcal; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>=95%). A small non-significant trend towards under-reporting of carbohydrates (CHOs) was observed (WMD=-9.17 g, 95% CI: -20.58 to 2.24 g; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>=64%), but no differences were found in protein (WMD=-0.08 g, 95% CI: -3.94 to 3.79 g; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>=68%, <em>p</em><0.01) or fat (WMD=-0.57 g, 95% CI: -2.58 to 1.43 g; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup>=12%, <em>p</em>=0.35). A meta-regression analysis found potential effects of the body-mass index (tests vs. DLW: ß=34.9, <em>p</em>=0.063) and duration of the assessment (tests vs. WFR: ß=-66.5, <em>p</em>=0.002) on EI; age (tests vs. 24-HDR: ß=-2.222, <em>p</em>=0.019) and duration of the assessment (tests vs. WFR: ß=-9.19, <em>p</em>=0.013) on CHO intake; duration of the assessment on protein intake (tests vs. WFR: ß=-3.2250, <em>p</em>=0.0175); and duration of the assessment on fat intake (tests vs. WFR: ß=-1.07, <em>p</em>=0.040).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Except for DLW, no statistical difference was found between IBDAs and traditional methods. This suggests that like traditional methods, image-based methods have serious measurement errors, and more studies are needed to determine inherent measurement errors in IBDAs.</p>

Validity of dietary assessment methods compared with doubly labeled water in children: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Comparison of total energy intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall with total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method in adults

Validity of image-based dietary assessment methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigating sex differences in the accuracy of dietary assessment methods to measure energy intake in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Meta analysis of the validity of image-based dietary assessment method based on energy and macronutrients].

Relative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records As Compared with Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women.

Validity of a Dietary Questionnaire Assessed by Comparison with Multiple Weighed Dietary Records or 24-Hour Recalls.

Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods

Representation of adults with class III obesity in studies assessing validity of self‐reported energy intake using doubly labeled water: A systematic review

Methodological considerations and future insights for 24-hour dietary recall assessment in children

Energy intake and expenditure: Validation of a diet history by heart rate monitoring, activity diary and doubly labeled water

A New Mobile Phone-Based Tool for Assessing Energy and Certain Food Intakes in Young Children: A Validation Study

Assessing daily energy intake in adult women: validity of a food-recognition mobile application compared to doubly labelled water

Total energy expenditure measured using doubly labeled water in adults with major chronic diseases: A systematic review

Relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record in German toddlers.

Experience of dietary assessment and validation from three Swedish studies in the elderly

Development and Validation of a Dish-Based Iranian Food Frequency Questionnaire: A Protocol Study

Comparison of the Diet Photograph Record to Weighed Dietary Record and 24 H Dietary Recall for Estimating Energy and Nutrient Intakes among Chinese Preschoolers.

Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake

VALIDITY OF FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE TO INVESTIGATE THE DIETARY ENERGY AND NUTRIENTS INTAKE

Validation of an web-based dietary assessment tool (RiksmatenFlex) against doubly labelled water and 24 h dietary recalls in pregnant women