Abstract:The ability of a Bayesian atmospheric inversion to quantify the Paris region's fossil fuel CO2 emissions on a monthly basis, based on a network of three surface stations operated for 1 year as part of the CO2-MEGAPARIS experiment (August 2010–July 2011), is analysed. Differences in hourly CO2 atmospheric mole fractions between the near-ground monitoring sites (CO2 gradients), located at the north-eastern and south-western edges of the urban area, are used to estimate the 6 h mean fossil fuel CO2 emission. The inversion relies on the CHIMERE transport model run at 2 km × 2 km horizontal resolution, on the spatial distribution of fossil fuel CO2 emissions in 2008 from a local inventory established at 1 km × 1 km horizontal resolution by the AIRPARIF air quality agency, and on the spatial distribution of the biogenic CO2 fluxes from the C-TESSEL land surface model. It corrects a prior estimate of the 6 h mean budgets of the fossil fuel CO2 emissions given by the AIRPARIF 2008 inventory. We found that a stringent selection of CO2 gradients is necessary for reliable inversion results, due to large modelling uncertainties. In particular, the most robust data selection analysed in this study uses only mid-afternoon gradients if wind speeds are larger than 3 m s−1 and if the modelled wind at the upwind site is within ±15° of the transect between downwind and upwind sites. This stringent data selection removes 92 % of the hourly observations. Even though this leaves few remaining data to constrain the emissions, the inversion system diagnoses that their assimilation significantly reduces the uncertainty in monthly emissions: by 9 % in November 2010 to 50 % in October 2010. The inverted monthly mean emissions correlate well with independent monthly mean air temperature. Furthermore, the inverted annual mean emission is consistent with the independent revision of the AIRPARIF inventory for the year 2010, which better corresponds to the measurement period than the 2008 inventory. Several tests of the inversion's sensitivity to prior emission estimates, to the assumed spatial distribution of the emissions, and to the atmospheric transport modelling demonstrate the robustness of the measurement constraint on inverted fossil fuel CO2 emissions. The results, however, show significant sensitivity to the description of the emissions' spatial distribution in the inversion system, demonstrating the need to rely on high-resolution local inventories such as that from AIRPARIF. Although the inversion constrains emissions through the assimilation of CO2 gradients, the results are hampered by the improperly modelled influence of remote CO2 fluxes when air masses originate from urbanised and industrialised areas north-east of Paris. The drastic data selection used in this study limits the ability to continuously monitor Paris fossil fuel CO2 emissions: the inversion results for specific months such as September or November 2010 are poorly constrained by too few CO2 measurements. The high sensitivity of the inverted emissions to the prior emissions' diurnal variations highlights the limitations induced by assimilating data only during the afternoon. Furthermore, even though the inversion improves the seasonal variation and the annual budget of the city's emissions, the assimilation of data during a limited number of suitable days does not necessarily yield robust estimates for individual months. These limitations could be overcome through a refinement of the data processing for a wider data selection, and through the expansion of the observation network.

Bayesian inversion of emissions from large urban fire using in situ observations

From Fluxes to Signals: A Joint Analysis of GHG and Air Quality over the Paris Megacity

An Attempt at Estimating Paris Area CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Emissions from Atmospheric Concentration Measurements

Two-step AI-aided Bayesian source identification of urban-scale pollution

Bayesian estimation of airborne fugitive emissions using a Gaussian plume model

High‐Resolution Lagrangian Inverse Modeling of CO2 Emissions over the Paris Region During the First 2020 Lockdown Period

Quantitative evaluation of the uncertainty sources for the modeling of atmospheric CO 2 concentration within and in the vicinity of Paris city

High-resolution Inversion of Fossil Fuel Emissions and Biogenic Fluxes over the Paris Region During 2019-2020

Can We Use Atmospheric CO2 Measurements to Verify Emission Trends Reported by Cities? Lessons from a 6-Year Atmospheric Inversion over Paris

Sensitivity to the Sources of Uncertainties in the Modeling of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Within and in the Vicinity of Paris

An attempt at estimating Paris area CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from atmospheric concentration measurements

Can We Use Atmospheric CO2 Measurements to Verify Emission Trends Reported by Cities? Lessons from a Six-Year Atmospheric Inversion over Paris

Source term estimation for continuous plume dispersion in Fusion Field Trial-07: Bayesian inference probability adjoint inverse method

Bayesian Source Term Estimation of Atmospheric Releases in Urban Areas Using LES Approach.

Local-scale atmospheric inversions to monitor CH4 emissions from industrial sites using mobile and/or fixed-point measurements

Probabilistic Inversion Modeling of Gas Emissions: A Gradient-Based MCMC Estimation of Gaussian Plume Parameters

The First 1-Year-long Estimate of the Paris Region Fossil Fuel Co2 Emissions Based on Atmospheric Inversion

An attempt at estimating Paris area CO 2 emissions from 1 atmospheric concentration measurements 2 3

Assessing the Effectiveness of an Urban CO2 Monitoring Network Through the COVID-19 Lockdown Natural Experiment

Airborne contaminant source estimation using a finite-volume forward solver coupled with a Bayesian inversion approach

What Would Dense Atmospheric Observation Networks Bring to the Quantification of City CO2 Emissions?